On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:22:51 +0100, Rebecca <[email protected]> wrote:
In terms of things I think Cinelerra needs to improve on – Interface I don’t actually think this is a really big deal.Sure a more attractive interface would be a bonus, but honestly I thinka reskin on the level of what Cinecutie did is adequate.
I agree. At least in the short term. And that is pretty low hanging fruit.
Transitions I come down firmly on the side of not transitioning between tracksby default – I like the way transitions are displayed now. It would be nice if they could be “dragged” to increase or decreaselength rather than right-clicking and manually assigning a length,
There is another snag with transitions: They are applied _before_ the effects. If you have applied some different colour and contrast effects to scene A and scene B, then add a transition between them, then scene A will "snap" to raw and uncorrected when the transitions starts. Making transitons "post-effect" would likely be a rather invasive change. But it's the only way to make grading and transitions in one pass, with acceptable results.
Functionality Finally, but probably most importantly, some words on generalfunctionality. I am actually pretty happy overall with Cinelerraand its capabilities. I think the most glaring absence is thenested sequences feature –
Yes! It's direly needed for larger projects. -- Herman Robak _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
