Laura wrote: <<<< Non-breeders may lack experience <<<< breeding, but they do not lack for intelligence. If they get real factual <<<< information about the 3 issues I discussed yesterday and not generalized <<<< misconstrued statements--they will vote to resolve this issue. They will <<<< understand completely that it is for the betterment of the breed.
Well, thank you for agreeing that we are capable of making intelligent decisions. ;-) I, for one, will be happy to consider voting for the change *when* and *if* full testing (and disclosure) and the suggested protocol become mandatory. I do hear what you're all saying about increasing the gene pool, but until there's some safeguard against (even more) indiscriminate breeding then we're not doing our breed any favors. Winnie Columbus, NC ========================================================"Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
