In a message dated 6/20/2002 10:23:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


>  think there is a difference between having a disqualification that
> prevents the puppy from showing, and having a puppy that doesn't quite turn
> out perfect for the show ring.
>
> For instance, if I sold a show potential Japanese Chin, which are supposed
> to have white in the corner of their eyes, but the whites clouded up, I
> would not refund any money, because lack of white in the corner of the eye
> is not a disqualification, and I have finished Chin without it.
>
> But if I sold a show potential pup and its testicles didn't descend, then
> that is a disqualification, and I would refund the difference between pet
> and show price, assuming the owner wanted to keep the dog.  So unless there
> is a disqualification, the buyer assumes the risk.
>
> All that said, I have yet to sell a show prospect puppy at a show price
> that
> was less than six months old; at six months, I have a pretty good idea how
> they will turn out.  I sold the last one at eight months old, and he
> finished in two or three weekends.
>
> "Show potential" puppies that go at twelve weeks old, are sold for a pet
> price, with full disclosure to the owners that they are the ones taking the
> risk.
>
> Leanne
>

Leanne,
I think your approach is an excellent one.  I agree in every way. However I
think I heard several people on this list say that even if the dog develops a
disqualification then that's tough cookies (my words) for the buyer.
Glenn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn Fulton
Cincinnati/Mason
permission to forward granted

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to