On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 20:40, DHM <davidhmar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Um... I don't want this to devolve into an argument, but can I voice > my support for going with the full docstring tooltip? > Having tried it, it seems really useful to me, and I don't see the > reason to reduce the text to something shorter. I don't think the size > of the docstrings is inappropriate for a tooltip.
I totally agree. Shortening the docstrings even more is *way* too much work for everyone. Why should anyone do this when the docstrings are short enough to perfectly fit into the tooltip? Another point which favors docstring-in-tooltip: You can simply save the html on your disk for easy-to-use offline access. No need to deep-mirror a whole site. -- Moritz Ulrich -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
