-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 09:44, Patrick (Pat) Davis wrote:
> publicity isn't everything- as evinced by Evil Uncle Bill's OS. So, from
> your own perspectives which is better, KDE or Gnome... or is it just a case
> of what one is used to?
yes and no. there are actual, measurable advantages/disadvantages between the
two of them. however, whever they mean anything to you depends on how you use
the system and what your expectations/needs/desires/preferences are.
if you wish to avoid being swayed by publicity, then perhaps you should try
them both and decide for yourself.
btw, there really isn't any coherent KDE marketing plan. that is something
that the GNOME project tends to be better at, actually. which makes the fact
that you hear more about KDE than GNOME rather interesting. in the closed
source world, dollars drives visibility. in Free software, popularity does.
neither are necessarily tied to quality, of course. =)
- --
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"
- Albert Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE95Pm31rcusafx20MRAoY5AJ4swCVzKlTeSVtVBB1G1yD6o6raMQCgpyf+
9oPF6B9vHSUTKW2QPf0QBe0=
=/ovT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
