Hey Kev,

It appears that they have been patching it. I'm not sure when the last patch
was posted but I do have all the ones that needed to be applied to
SmoothWall. I think I will have to give IPcop a go for sure. It seems that
these guys have taken the torch and run with it.

I'll post my results to the list.

Thanks again guys!

Jarrod

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) SmoothWall help


> The fork is called IPcop.
>
> I haven't done much more than see either, but it might help.  Smoothwall
GPL
> seemed old, the last time I checked.  Not that that is a bad thing, but it
> made me worry that they weren't really supporting it anymore.
>
> Kev.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jarrod Major" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:40 AM
> Subject: Re: (clug-talk) SmoothWall help
>
>
> > Hey Doug, Jason, Kevin and Graham,
> >
> > I am using SmoothWall GPL 0.9.9 SE and I have the patches for it as
well.
> > Yes I believe it has been forked but this is the most recent stable GPL
> > version. There is a beta but I wanted to stay away from that for now.
> >
> > Kevin I believe the Fork is one they are charging for so I don't think
> that
> > will do. If you find something that is still GPL let me know.
> >
> > Yes, we had tried setting SmoothWall up with only one NIC in at a time
to
> > see if we could isolate it. This also did not work.
> >
> > Thanks for the link Doug, I may try LRP but I wanted something robust
> enough
> > to handle some tricky stuff. The P90 and P166 only have about 32Mb RAM
so
> > I'm not sure if they would be able to run LRP. The P233 has 64MB and
> appears
> > to be a more likely candidate. I may check this out.
> >
> > Good questions and suggestions guys.
> >
> > BTW, Graham, I too have heard that RealTek's can be flaky but I have
used
> > them in all my computers and they seem to work fine. If you want to
check
> > your DLink card to find out whether it is a RealTek card it should be
> fairly
> > obvious, the chip should have rtl followed by either 8129 or 8139 on it
> for
> > the 10BaseT or 10/100BaseT respectively. I know that some cards by a
> > particular manufacturer spontaneously change chipmakers during the
course
> of
> > a NIC card's lifespan. It starts out as a RealTek then they get
something
> > else. So when you think you using a card that has good Linux support for
a
> > particular chipset and the manufacturer changes you are hooped. I always
> > check my hardware. The better support sites not only list the hardware
but
> > even go so far as to list chipsets to offset this issue.
> >
> > Jarrod
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Graham Monk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 10:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: (clug-talk) SmoothWall help
> >
> >
> > > Jarrod Major wrote:
> > >
> > > >I decided to try my hand at making a home firewall/gateway.
SmoothWall
> > > >seemed to be the distro of choice. I had two computers that were
likely
> > > >candidates for the job an IBM Aptiva P166 and a Packard Bell P90.
Both
> > still
> > > >very serviceable. I also have a small collection of Linux-proven
NIC's
> > that
> > > >I thought would work just fine in this application.
> > > >
> > > >After several attempts on these two boxes, I ended up picking up a
Dell
> > > >Pentium 233. This computer also seems to not want to take to
installing
> > > >SmoothWall. I have checked the SmoothWall site for hardware
> compatibility
> > > >and the NIC's for the most part appear to be supported. Here's a list
> of
> > > >what I have and the Linux driver module typically used:
> > > >
> > > >PCI
> > > >RealTek 8139 10/100 - rtl8139
> > > >RealTek 8129 10 BaseT - ne2k-pc / ne2k / ne
> > > >SMC EtherPower - tulip
> > > >
> > > >ISA
> > > >Intel EtherExpress 16 - eexpress
> > > >3Com ?? - ??
> > > >
> > > >All three computers will get to the Green NIC probe phase and fail.
The
> > > >probe will not autodetect the cards. I have gone into manual mode and
> > given
> > > >it the appropriate module, IO and IRQ. All to no avail. These cards
> have
> > all
> > > >worked under Windows not very long ago and some have even run
perfectly
> > fine
> > > >under other distributions of Linux. I am very careful with my
hardware
> so
> > I
> > > >cannot believe that they could all be bad.
> > > >
> > > >The ISO I used for burning my SmoothWall disc was checked against the
> MD5
> > > >Checksum and it was verified.
> > > >
> > > >I cannot believe that three computers would all refuse to take this
> > install
> > > >with various NIC's in place. I enlisted Marcel's help and he could
not
> > > >overcome my install issues either. We're both stymied.
> > > >
> > > >Anyone have any experience they'd like to share or any advice? Thanks
> in
> > > >advance.
> > > >
> > > >As an aside, we even attempted to throw OpenBSD on one of the boxes
and
> > it
> > > >crapped out almost immediately. We were pretty tired at this point so
> we
> > did
> > > >not delve too deeply into this install. It was a floppy/FTP install.
> > > >
> > > >Jarrod Major
> > > >CLUG Treasurer
> > > >Registered Linux User: #224211
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Hi Jarrod
> > > I fear I may make myself look stupid here but anyway,
> > > I had problems with smoothwall myself using Dlink cards
> > > which are supposed to use realtek chips but do something weird
> > > with them. I found that startec S100 works well.
> > > Suggestion,.... Try installing with only one card ( first one then the
> > > other)
> > > This should at least isolate which card is causing problems, assuming
> > > this is not something you have allready tried.
> > > Graham
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to