Thanks, Dan. You might be right about my hardware. I had one indication
of a problem right off the bat. Before attempting to install Linux, I
used XP for a few days. When I attempted to install Adobe Acrobat Reader
(on XP), it kept telling me I had no hard drive space available -- even
though I had 50-odd GB free. Dell technical support was unable to
resolve the problem over the phone. Then the problem seemed to disappear
on its own. Meantime, I tried to return the PC to Dell, which
(successfully) offered me a discount of $267, or 25% off, to keep it.

Pat


On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 17:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pat Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sunday, February 2, 2003 4:42 pm
> Subject: (clug-talk) (RH8-Dell D. 2350) crashes
> 
> > I've been using Red Hat 8.0 on a Dell Dimension 2350 (2GH Celeron /
> > 512MB RAM) since early January. Bottom-line impression: I love Linux.
> > 
> > But there's one problem I'd love to resolve. Linux has crashed while
> > surfing the Web, on average, at least every two hours (during at least
> > 50 hours total browsing). 
> > 
> > Konqueror seems more stable than Galeon and Opera, and all seem 
> > somewhatmore stable than Mozilla. There's little consistency. 
> > Mozilla, for
> > example, crashed on the third page I accessed today (Yahoo News); but
> > when I rebooted I surfed that page and many others for more than 
> > an hour
> > without hanging.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, I've worked more than 40 hours in OpenOffice Writer and can
> > only recall it hanging once. Evolution rarely hangs and the CD player
> > (kscd) hasn't crashed yet
> > 
> > To compare OSes on the same machine, I've spent about 15 hours surfing
> > in Windows 2000 (using Opera, Internet Explorer and Phoenix) and had
> > only two crashes -- a much better average than Linux. In each OS,
> > control-alt-delete won't force a reboot after a crash.
> > 
> > I usually work in KDE, but didn't document any improvement during 
> > aboutfour hours in GNOME (on Mozilla, Opera, Galeon and Konqueror).
> > 
> > Another quirk in Linux: the hard drive sometimes runs for three 
> > minutesfor no reason.
> > 
> > Also, Evolution is very slow (maybe 10 seconds) opening HTML e-
> > mails. Is
> > this normal, or possibly related to my Web-browsing problem?
> > 
> > BACKGROUND: Inside the Dell box, there are NO CARDS. Everything -- 
> > videocontroller, network controller, etc. -- is embedded in the 
> > motherboard.(Luckily there were three empty slots.) The video 
> > controller -- which
> > wouldn't work with Linux -- could NEITHER BE REMOVED NOR DISABLED.
> > 
> > As a non-technical person, I was in over my head long before this 
> > point.I'm much obliged to CLUG member Johnny Stork for coming up 
> > with the
> > various workarounds that enabled me to use Linux my new computer. (I
> > just wish I'd talked to him before buying the Dell.)
> > 
> > The workaround Johnny came up for the video controller was to set 
> > up a
> > dual-monitor system and to designate the new video card (HIS TNT2 M64
> > PCI) as primary and the built-in video controller as secondary. 
> > (So the
> > original controller which couldn't be disabled is now outputting 
> > to a
> > non-existent monitor.)
> > 
> > Does anyone have any suggestions? Do I have any options beyond selling
> > the new $800 Dell at a discount to my brother-in-law (who prefers XP)
> > and starting from scratch on another new computer??
> > 
> > Any comments or anecdotes (e.g., your own experience with bundled,
> > brand-name systems, both positive and negative) will be much
> > appreciated.
> > 
> > Thanks for reading. Sorry it's so long.
> > 
> > Pat
> 
> Hi Pat, 
> 
> I use a number of distributions on different hardware platforms and simply have zero 
>and I do mean "ZERO" crashes, glitches nada, from Netcrap, Moz or Konqueror. I can 
>only conclude that your PC has some serious hardware deficiency which is certainly 
>not of your fault. I your brother inlaw wants it let him have it.He'll never know the 
>diff anyway with XP anyway. Good luck....
> 
> All the best, Dan  
> 
> 


Reply via email to