DanielLeens commented on PR #12081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/pull/12081#issuecomment-6514221970

   Thanks @SEZ9. I checked the exact-head pointers rather than asking for 
another status table. RequestFuture.java:57-67 explicitly limits untimed get() 
to Future compliance; the storage call sites use the timed overload. Its timed 
contract is documented at :70-89 and returns the actual success Boolean. 
imap-storage-file/pom.xml:87-89 explicitly declares mockito-junit-jupiter in 
test scope. IMapFileStorage.java:365-375 treats timeout at WARN with 
requestId/elapsed/limit, with the stack at DEBUG and unexpected exceptions at 
ERROR. Those earlier F1-F8 points were reconciled in my last full review. The 
remaining requests are that review's engine persistence integration and 
bilingual fail-loud operational guidance, plus its nonblocking 
deadline-test/stream-cleanup corrections. CI has now completed red in unit-test 
(11): SavePointTest.testSavePointButJobGoingToFail expected DOING_SAVEPOINT but 
observed FAILED. Latest dev has no corresponding merged SavePointTest fix, so a 
simple sync is n
 ot an established cure; preserve the exact failed-job diagnostics rather than 
treating CI as proof the remaining recovery coverage is unnecessary.
   
   Snapshot 2026-10-30T03:23:54.162383+00:00: head 
`8f2f6fa986b04ef3f96315dcf722a282357d744d`; [Signal pull request 
update](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/actions/runs/40864785509/job/123852183704)
 = `SUCCESS`; [Build](https://github.com/apache/seatunnel/runs/123860691341) = 
`FAILURE`.
   
   Base `dev`; comparison `diverged`, ahead 19, behind 3; merge state 
`blocked`. Behind/diverged alone is recorded metadata and does not add a sync 
request. This is an unchanged-head discussion/CI clarification, not a new 
complete source review, an effective approval or a dismissal of historical 
requested changes.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to