> Option D: > <service-point id="..."> > <service-definition point-id="..."> > <configuration-point id="..."> > <configuration-definition point-id="..."> // not very sure > about this > though. >
That seems off to me; <service-definition> is close, I think, but not quite accurate (that's why I like <implementation>, which is very accurate). <configuration-definition> is way off, since it doesn't define the configuration, it provides a part of the configuration; that's why I keep coming back to "contribution". Howard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
