<service id="..."> <contribution service-id="..."> <configuration id="..."> <contribution configuration-id="...">
How do you like this?
-Harish
Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
Contribution seems appropriate. So how about <service-contribution> and <configuration-contribution>?
And, we loop full circle back to how I had it before I decided to line up with Eclipse's naming (what a mistaken idea).
I don't mind <service-contribution>, because its a very rare case.
<configuration-contribution> is just too long for something that will be typed (until the magic tools support appears) all the time.
-- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/ http://javatapestry.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
