Re: [HiveMind] naming update

[Harish Krishnaswamy]

I agree, I wasn't very inclined towards that either, just wanted to see 
what others thought. But implementation is not very intuitive at least 
in the following case, I think...

<implementation ...>
   <interceptor .../>
</implementation>
Contribution seems appropriate. So how about <service-contribution> and 
<configuration-contribution>?

-Harish

Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:

Option D:
<service-point id="...">
<service-definition point-id="...">
<configuration-point id="...">
<configuration-definition point-id="...">    // not very sure 
about this 
though.

   

That seems off to me; <service-definition> is close, I think, but not quite 
accurate (that's why I
like <implementation>, which is very accurate).
<configuration-definition> is way off, since it doesn't define the configuration, it 
provides a part
of the configuration; that's why I keep coming back to "contribution".
Howard

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]