To me implementation implies core implementation that's probably where the disconnect is. What does it instantly mean to others?

-Harish

Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:

The point I am trying to make is you could already have a service implementation provided by some third party in a module and all you could be doing is adding an interceptor to it. In that case implementation doesn't sound appropriate, its more a contribution, I think. What you say?!

-Harish



You are providing a part of the implementation, in the form of an interceptor.


--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to