> 
> Contribution seems appropriate. So how about 
> <service-contribution> and 
> <configuration-contribution>?
> 

And, we loop full circle back to how I had it before I decided to line up with 
Eclipse's naming
(what a mistaken idea).

I don't mind <service-contribution>, because its a very rare case.

<configuration-contribution> is just too long for something that will be typed (until 
the magic
tools support appears) all the time.

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/
http://javatapestry.blogspot.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to