> The point I am trying to make is you could already have a service > implementation provided by some third party in a module and all you > could be doing is adding an interceptor to it. In that case > implementation doesn't sound appropriate, its more a contribution, I > think. What you say?! > > -Harish
You are providing a part of the implementation, in the form of an interceptor. -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/hivemind/ http://javatapestry.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
