On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:58:45PM +0200, pike wrote: > Hi > > >> Bear with me :-) The bitbake recipe refers to the ipk ? > > > > bitbake recipe is "build description" which instructs bitbake how to > > create correct .ipk or .dep or .rpm or whatever from "source archive". > > > > In thone case it's "repackaging" your scripts. > > > > Thanks for being clear here. I thought long > and deep about this, and, read a manual :-)
> Probably the bitbake recipe is more complicated > than the ipk it creates, but I guess that doesnt > matter on your side - you need the recipe, not > the bread. So can I push the recipe for 0.6 as is and then improve it with next version? I would like to.. as I'm leaving tomorrow for few days.. And it's pretty simple http://paste.pocoo.org/show/196533/ but those 'cp' aren't good practise as you cannot easily adjust ie file permissions as install call does.. > For now, I'll try hosting the ipkg myself; > based on the one you created. > A question: why is that file different than > the ipkg described by QTopia > http://qtextended.org/modules/developers/qtopia.php?linkFile=developers/IPKG_Howto > or even here > http://handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/BuildingIpkgs > In these descriptions, the control directory is > a directory, not a file. I never used ipkg-build manually, I guess that CONTROL is only temporary file and CONTROL/control is what is packed in .ipk as control, so the same.. but as I said before, I never used it manualy and I'm not .ipk format expert :). > just curious, > *-pike Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
