In my previous email when I meant *"**User could be initiating scan" *I
actually meant "*Application could be initiating scan".*

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Naveen Singh <nav...@nestlabs.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Patrik Flykt <
> patrik.fl...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 10:52 -0700, Naveen Singh wrote:
>> > This may not happen at all. My understanding is that wpa_supplicant
>> would
>> > time out only if the AP is not seen in subsequent scans. But the AP is
>> > always found in scan as there is nothing wrong at 802.11 level. The user
>> > found that WAN cable was not connected so he went ahead and fixed it.
>> And
>> > now the connection to DHCP server is established but connection will
>> still
>> > not happen. Is user supposed to power off the AP so that it disappears
>> from
>> > scan list.
>>
>> wpa_s will time out wifi networks in 2 minutes if no scans have been
>> done to refresh them. For ConnMan it will take ~6 min 20 sec to get
>> fresh results with a new scan after the 2 minute expiry time.
>>
>> If the user is connected to the system, nothing prevents the user from
>> connecting manually and immediately after said WAN cable is reattached.
>>
>
> This certainly is an issue because of following reasons:
> 1. User could be initiating scan for it to get connected back to network
> so there will never be a 2 minute expiry.
> 2. WAN detachment was just an example, it could very well be an
> intermittent problem which does not require any intervention from user and
> problem auto-corrects itself.
> 3. Expecting user to connect manually is not an option all the time. User
> rely on their devices to get connected on their own so that they can
> control these devices from anywhere.
> 4. I tested multiple devices in the same environment and each and every
> device auto-connected on its own once the problem vansihes. This seems to
> me as a use case that we have not considered and it surely requires some
> fix in the connman.
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>         Patrik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> connman mailing list
>> connman@connman.net
>> https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
connman mailing list
connman@connman.net
https://lists.connman.net/mailman/listinfo/connman

Reply via email to