Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > The best answer I can find is: your bugs/suggestions were certainly not
> > urgent enough to be taken into account by a far-too-small development team
> > who is all the time under very tight time schedule..
>
> All I report are serious! There are plenty of others which I hold
> off reporting till the serious ones are fixed. For example, the
> last thing the installer should do is run makewhatis and updatedb,
> otherwise a half-dozen useful/essential commands do not work.
> Reported during 7.0 beta. Still not done for the 7.1 beta. It's
> only a two liner before exiting, surely?
Maybe we do not want to do it, didn't you suppose that?
Can you imagine the reaction of the people if we make a "updatedb" at the
end of install, blocking the system for 2-3 minutes.. When you wait and
nothing happens, 150 seconds are really long seconds!
> > You don't need to lose your time, daily, that way.
> >
> > The best you can do is to extensively test the beta & final versions.
> >
> > Cooker is just for development people.
>
> Wrong! The present Cooker is the 7.1 beta, and the Cooker mailing
^^^^^^
weee. :-(
btw, you're wrong, the present Cooker is not the 7.1 beta as it was
released a week ago, as an iso image.
> list is the bug reporting medium, both as declared by Gael Duval and
> explained on the web page. That it is the beta is confirmed by the
> contents of the VERSION file in the beta root directory.
We're constantly updating rpm's, thus leading to temporary problems..
Well, I don't want to waste my time on that explanation..
--
Guillaume Cottenceau
