On Wed Apr 17 17:10 +0200, Han wrote: > Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html > > > > > > I'm not entirely sure that DJB is a reliable source when it comes to > > > Postfix versus qmail... ;-) > > > > A good read on DJB stuff: > > > > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb > > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download. > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try to > make a point. This is so totally uncool.
DJB, from what I've seen, seems to slander postfix (and bind) on a regular basis. The qmail vs. postfix debate seems to, ultimately, boil down to an endless "Am not!" "Are too!" flame war. It's a holy war at the level of emacs vs. vi, KDE vs. GNOME, GPL vs. BSD License, etc. AFAIC, the bottom line is: if you like qmail, use qmail; if you like postfix, use postfix. Simple as that. -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] When it comes down to desperation, You make the best of your situation. Linux 2.4.18-6mdk 1:01pm up 2:15, 4 users, load average: 0.09, 0.02, 0.01
