On Wed Apr 17, 2002 at 01:43:09PM -0400, Levi Ramsey wrote: [...] > > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download. > > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try to > > make a point. This is so totally uncool. > > DJB, from what I've seen, seems to slander postfix (and bind) on a > regular basis.
Well said. But at least he has a good reason for bashing bind... =) postfix, while not my favourite, isn't hated by me... I just don't like it that much. 'nuff said. But the postfix/qmail thing swings both ways... postfix "people" tend to be very anti-qmail, and vice versa. You almost never hear people in either camps bash sendmail or exim. Strange, no? They take after the authors I guess. > The qmail vs. postfix debate seems to, ultimately, boil down to an > endless "Am not!" "Are too!" flame war. It's a holy war at the level > of emacs vs. vi, KDE vs. GNOME, GPL vs. BSD License, etc. > > AFAIC, the bottom line is: if you like qmail, use qmail; if you like > postfix, use postfix. Simple as that. Amen to that! -- MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/ "lynx -source http://www.freezer-burn.org/bios/vdanen.gpg | gpg --import" 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux kernel 2.4.18-6mdk uptime: 4 days 12 hours 53 minutes.
msg62977/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
