Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb > > > > > > > > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k > > > > download. Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies > > > > when they try to make a point. This is so totally uncool. > > > > > > DJB, from what I've seen, seems to slander postfix (and bind) on a > > > regular basis. > > > > Well he has it on his page and he doesn't remove it. Even if he is > > right he shouldn't do that. But that is his problem not mine. > > Everywhere I _mention_ the name of djb or qmail I get tons of people > > that give their unmotified opinion about the man and about anything > > else. > > That's pure fud. You haven't contradicted the facts stated in the link > I've mentioned, thus until you do so, _I_ consider your asserts > hate/lies/"unmotified opinion".
Even though I _may_ know some things I have chosen not to mention anything bad about mailservers I don't use. Simply because people should have a free choice and postfix , qmail, sendmail and exim simply work and have been used by lots of people. They can't be that bad. If you ask me why I use qmail, I will say the securitty is really good, not a single exploit in 4 years, easy to configure and really fast and really small ( 200K for all sources ). If somebody ask me why I don't use another one I say I don't know them so well. So why can't you respect my choice. Why do you have to post this link. Why don't you stick to the facts? What do you think it solves? Who do you think you expose. You are filled with hatred. Why? Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
