Levi Ramsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed Apr 17 17:10 +0200, Han wrote: > > Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > A good read on DJB stuff: > > > > > > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb > > > > Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download. > > Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try > > to make a point. This is so totally uncool. > > DJB, from what I've seen, seems to slander postfix (and bind) on a > regular basis.
Well he has it on his page and he doesn't remove it. Even if he is right he shouldn't do that. But that is his problem not mine. Everywhere I _mention_ the name of djb or qmail I get tons of people that give their unmotified opinion about the man and about anything else. > The qmail vs. postfix debate seems to, ultimately, boil down to an > endless "Am not!" "Are too!" flame war. It's a holy war at the level > of emacs vs. vi, KDE vs. GNOME, GPL vs. BSD License, etc. I have learned my lesson and I refuse on saying anything bad about postfix or sendmail. I respect other peoples opinions about their favourite mta. > AFAIC, the bottom line is: if you like qmail, use qmail; if you like > postfix, use postfix. Simple as that. Hear, hear. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
