Han <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That's pure fud. You haven't contradicted the facts stated in the link > > I've mentioned, thus until you do so, _I_ consider your asserts > > hate/lies/"unmotified opinion". > > Even though I _may_ know some things I have chosen not to mention > anything bad about mailservers I don't use. Simply because people should > have a free choice and postfix , qmail, sendmail and exim simply work > and have been used by lots of people. They can't be that bad.
On the opposite, technical ML's are here so that people can express technically motivated opinions to teach things to others and have a discussion on technical merits. > If you ask me why I use qmail, I will say the securitty is really good, > not a single exploit in 4 years, easy to configure and really fast and > really small ( 200K for all sources ). Sounds good technical points. > If somebody ask me why I don't use another one I say I don't know them > so well. Right. > So why can't you respect my choice. Why do you have to post this link. I respect your choice, there is nothing to discuss on this subject. I've: 1- posted a link on DJB, seemingly full of argumented facts 2- been answered by "blah this is hate/lies" without a single argument > Why don't you stick to the facts? What do you think it solves? Who do > you think you expose. > > You are filled with hatred. Why? I don't feel so. You were the first to say that what the link I posted was hate/lies, not me! I simply answered that according to me, _your_ unmotivated points were considered, at least by me, as hate/lies until further arguments be presented (which your message partly do). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
