Hello Levi,
Wednesday, April 17, 2002, 10:43:09 AM, you wrote: > On Wed Apr 17 17:10 +0200, Han wrote: >> Guillaume Cottenceau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> > > > http://cr.yp.to/maildisasters/postfix.html >> > > >> > > I'm not entirely sure that DJB is a reliable source when it comes to >> > > Postfix versus qmail... ;-) >> > >> > A good read on DJB stuff: >> > >> > http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb >> >> Heh, I that all you can do? Well it wasn't worth the 400k download. >> Why do anti dbj people always depend on hate and lies when they try to >> make a point. This is so totally uncool. > DJB, from what I've seen, seems to slander postfix (and bind) on a > regular basis. > The qmail vs. postfix debate seems to, ultimately, boil down to an > endless "Am not!" "Are too!" flame war. It's a holy war at the level > of emacs vs. vi, KDE vs. GNOME, GPL vs. BSD License, etc. > AFAIC, the bottom line is: if you like qmail, use qmail; if you like > postfix, use postfix. Simple as that. Sorry about this thread. Personally I don't care whichever one will support what I want to do in a secure way. Up till recently this has been qmail but that is why I'm always looking at others. Qmail is not a bad product but it's license is and it is now getting kind of long in the tooth for supporting current standards unless you want to break the license. So I must evaluate products that meet current needs. -- Best regards, Brook mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
