Mounting suggestion:  I went to a cell phone installer and was given
(free)
a floor mount they had just taken out of a vehicle.  It's a five inch long
flexible neck with a square base on both ends.  My mechanic mounted it to
the bottom lip of the panel in the center (two holes drilled). I covered
the
other end with velcro.  The velcro end is where I place my ICOM A-22.  At
the top of the neck (panel end) I attached the clamp mount that comes with
the Magellan SkyBlazer XL.  This arrangement has worked really well and
gives a good view of both radio and GPS.  Since the neck is flexible, the
unit can be adjusted to fit your particular placement preferences.  The
neck
is rigid enough to stay where you put it.  I flew my 'Coupe from Prescott,
AZ to OSH and back and was very happy with this arrangement.....it looks
good too.  I don't have to use the external antenna with the Magellan
either.  I just flip the little mast antenna up and get good reception
through the canopy.
Jim
N-87112
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, April 16, 1998 4:53 AM
Subject: GPS


>I can't help but add my 2 cents worth on this subject.  I bought the
Garmin
>195 last year and paid about $1100 for it.  I read every review on as
many
>units as I could find; I talked to several different owners of different
>units, and I spoke with several manufacturers/distributers about their
>product.  It was hard to justify spending that much money, but I am very
>pleased with the unit.  I think the Garmin is an excellent product in
that
>it captures satilites quickly and holds them.  All indications are that
the
>garmin engine is one of the best in this regard.  I also like the fact
that
>the screen on the 195 is big compared to other units.  My eyes need big.
>The only drawback to the 195 is its overall size.  It comes with a clamp
to
>attach to the yoke, but the set up is too big for the coupe.  I just sit
it
>between my legs, the clamp acting as a stand.  I like the fact that it
>identifies roads, lakes, towns, etc as I fly along.  Makes my co-pilot's
>simultaneous tracking on a section very easy, and gives me a quick ref as
>to how far I am from anywhere I might want to go, or from where I started
>or from where I am going.  I would not hesitate to get another one,
>although a smaller cheaper ($700 or so) unit would also be acceptable.  I
>think the extra aviation features are worth the cost of getting an
aviation
>unit.  I plug the 195 into my lighter for power so I don't rely on the
>batteries.
>
>The GPS is great for tracking to a specific point since you can not only
>follow the heading indicated, but you can follow a line drawn on the
screen
>from your place of origination to the place you want to go--if the little
>plane gets off the line, just fly back to the line.  Its also great for
>just flying around the country side.  You don't have to keep track of
your
>exact location on a sectional to keep from getting lost.  When it is time
>to go home or to another airport (for fuel or food/etc), just look at the
>screen to see how far you are from a given landmark.  The GPS also serves
>as a back up for the heading indicator and compass--it gives an accurate
>readout of your track vs the bearing to a specific location, as well as
the
>declining distance to your destination and your ground speed.  It should
be
>a self-imposed mandatory instrument for every flight.
>
>Other than the availability of special aviation features in aviation
units,
>the biggest drawback to some other units is the lack of ground features
for
>reference, and the requirement to key-in lat and lon numbers to locate a
>specific location.  Too risky in my opinion--if you transpose a number,
or
>get your head buried in the machine trying to manipulate it, you are
likely
>to have a big problem.  The GPS is too good of an aviation tool to get
less
>than the best.  My recommendation is that anyone without an aviation GPS
>should put it at the top of their wish list for future aircraft/flight
>improvements.  Hopefully the Y2K problem will not affect GPS.
>
>Ken Doyle
>Springfield, Mo
>Alon N5477E
>
>
>

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to