On 11 January 2011 18:44, Eino Keskitalo <eino.keskit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Regarding what version would be good to test: we'd get the most > benefit from the development build, obviously. There's some good new > stuff in it that would be nice to get some feedback about: the new > tabs (monster and command tabs at least), the skill menu, other > things.. the timeframe sounds very short to overhaul the tutorial > before testing (and evaluation especially). Another option is to have > them look at 0.7, but the only really good reason imho would be if the > dev build is not stable enough.
I agree. In other news, the first new tutorial level is up. Though I still need to add some code, it actually works pretty well. We could even keep both the old and the new tutorial for the usability testing, to get a comparison. :) Unfortunately, the first level was the only one I already had planned out in detail. Not sure where to mention the tile tabs, either. > I haven't really played the tiles build in a long time, other than > quick testing before commits etc, so I don't know how it plays right > now. What unfinished stuff is in place that would be good to have > polished before the testing? I'm talking about half-implemented things > rather than missing but planned features. I guess this means we need those command tab tiles real soon. Also fix that lag. :( Otherwise, things are looking good for the early game. Looking forwards to the results, again, Johanna ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
