It clearly makes a noticeable difference.
On Sep 21, 2012 10:58 AM, "Russell Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:

> To be fair to John from Nfo, at least he is honest about not believing
> there to be a benefit to those tweaks. The nature of the market and
> customer demands force him into supplying those options, and because they
> have a real impact on server load force him into charging more.
>
> It is really on Valve to come out and say that 1000fps or 128 tic has no
> effect, and if that is the case disabling them.
>
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 4:00 AM, "Calvin Judy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Nuclear fallout is charging 14.99$/month extra just for 128 tickrate, when
> it costs about 1.5x more cpu to run.  This is the nonsense I'm pissed
> about, we've already had a representative of NFO Servers, come on the
> mailing list and say
> they can't verify whether 1000fps does ANYTHING additional for cients
> (which it doesn't), but they still market it for an additional 25$/month.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Csgo_servers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers
>
_______________________________________________
Csgo_servers mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers

Reply via email to