Dear Sébastien, Quoting Sébastien Villemot (2018-11-13 16:34:05) > Le mardi 13 novembre 2018 à 16:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >> I consider lintian an _aid_ but not authoritative. > I tend to consider lintian authoritative when there is no “higher > source of law” (such as the Policy, DevRef, team policies…).
Ok, so we agree that Debian Policy is more authoritative than lintian. Debian Policy states § 2.4 says this about section definitions: > For more information about the sections and their definitions, see the > list of sections in unstable. The web page https://packages.debian.org/unstable/ says this about section "localization": > Localization support for big software packages. ...and this about section "text": > Utilities to format and print text documents. It seems sensible to me that hunspell dictionaries are treated as utilites to process text documents rather than localization support. Localization is specific to mapping internationalization strings into a local context - purpos of a dictionary is far more general than that - and it seems all other maintainers of hunspell dictionaries besides you came to that same conclusion. Please reconsider your verdict of this bugreport. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
