Nic wrote:
> Nonononononono. No. I was saying that NT was more stable than 9x, but
> still crap compaired to other OSen.
Ahh, in which case the kettle is buttered on the other side of the
fish.
> Well, I'm going on the stability of the OS, ie allowing for crashing
> apps without taking the OS out too etc.
Perhaps, but recall Dennis's comments about D3 vs. D4 on
Win9x. We could end up with the same issues on Linux,
especially in the early (or maybe the V4? <g>) days...
Personally, I find D-anything on WinNT doesn't lead me to overly-
frequent reboots. Perhaps one every three or four days.
cheers,
peter
============================================
Peter Hyde, SPIS Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
* Print-to-Web automation http://TurboPress.com
* Web design, automation and hosting specialists
* TurboNote: http://TurboPress.com/tbnote.htm
-- small, FREE and very handy
Find all the above and MORE at http://www.spis.co.nz
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
