Am 12-Oct-18 um 18:18 schrieb Maarten Brouwers (murb):
It was a _description_ of the current site, basis for a discussion how
to improve, and served now for the new requirements document that
consider needs from the scratch. I recommend to keep this thread plain
as "check askbot" and to do the usability work in the other thread I
started this morning.
So tl;dr: This is the design list, we do 1/ "Identify core needs and usecases"
here. No tools/platform discussion. Next up would be finding enthusiastic
people willing to work on this.
... I agree with the critiques that the old ‘requirements’-document has way too
I definitely like this way to think. What always bothers me is
"extension and template" as if there is code (macros) and templates. We
can and do share more right now (color palettes, icon themes, gallery
images etc.) and plan to offer more. Thus two types of "creators"
contribute: those who could also share their stuff on Github and others
who are not too tech-savvy.
As for the users I wish to not need to go to some ther place but have
direct access in the program
Nevertheless we need it for some use cases.
Let’s start with some stake holders (not extensive):
- Want to find extensions that solve their needs (and that are trustworthy /
reliable / of quality)
- Want to help users find the best extensions as simply as possible
The extension creators
- Want to make their extension findable
- Wants the site to be maintained well
Thanks for commenting,
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/