I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form at [1]. The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers (Mike and I).
Cheers, Till [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator > On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Cool! > > On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> the way that moderation works at Apache is that moderators see candidate >> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply with no >> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all accepts the message >> and whitelists the sender. >> >> If no moderator takes action for several days, the message is deleted. >> >> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the reply-all trick. >> >> >> >> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note may indeed >>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to watch?) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Mike >>> >>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: >>> >>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m >>>> volunteering to be another moderator. >>>> >>>> Are there other volunteers? >>>> >>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather than fewer. >>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic to be >>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is very, very >>>>> low. >>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it higher, I >>>>> think, >>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. >>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators for the >>>>>> list. >>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other lists. >>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members moderate as >>>>>> well? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Till >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> Here’s the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Till >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + >>>>>> initial >>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take >>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, >>>>>> if >>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Till >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in on a >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there are >>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are decidedly >>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for >>>>>> them" >>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is there a >>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to >>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a post-joining-incubation >>>>>> decision. :-)) >>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>> Mike >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one and >>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a >>>>>> user-level. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers >>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way >>>>>> around. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would work >>>>>>>>>>> better. >>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? >>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira issues, >>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jochen >>>>>>>>>>> >
