Thanks so much Emma for the contribution and Oscar for driving the vote! :D This has been a fun thing to do -- I would love to see the pigeon immortalized someplace! Maybe on a website page for credits and contributors?
Emma, what do you think we need to finalize the logo? I'm starting a list of places that need to be updated, starting at https://www.apache.org/logos/ ! All my best, Ryan On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:04 AM Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The vote should have ended yesterday, but somehow we managed to more than > double the number of votes and still get the same outcome. The current > tally (all votes) is 5 votes for each option. > > So we're (again) at a tie. > > To force a conclusion, I'd like to resort to some arbitrary but hopefully > acceptable way to break the tie. By removing my own vote we'll get a simple > majority for one of the options (the same that failed to reach a +2 > majority the previous round). > > This then brings the final tally to: > > - 5 votes for V9.2 (the plane) > - 4 votes for V3.1 (the pigeon) > > Which means that the winner is: *V9.2* (the plane) > > Thank you all for voting! > > > Kind regards, > Oscar > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 13:51, Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for the explanation, Emma! > > > > My vote still goes to 9.2 > > > > Cheers, Fokko > > > > Op ma 23 okt 2023 om 07:39 schreef Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > v9.2 for me. I definitely prefer the blue color and I really don’t get > > > the pigeon. > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 23, 2023, at 5:04 AM, Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind < > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > TL;DR: if you haven't voted yet, please do so! > > > > > > > > As Emma has shown that an upwards angle change for V9.2 doesn't work, I > > > > think we should drop that version from the vote. > > > > > > > > This means, with the (binding) votes so far, that the result is a tie: > > > > > > > > - V9.2: 2 votes > > > > - V3.1: 2 votes > > > > > > > > Note: not everyone who voted the first round has voted again. > > > > > > > > *So if you have an opinion on the Avro logo, please vote!* > > > > > > > > On a side note: when I count all votes, there is no tie (there's an > > extra > > > > vote for v3.1). So if there are no additional votes, we can still have > > a > > > > result. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Oscar > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 16:42, Emma K <emma.a.kel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Oops! I realized there is a typo in my last message. I wrote that V3.2 > > > is a > > > >> finalist (the pigeon without the outlines) instead of V3.1 as a > > finalist > > > >> (the pigeon with the outlines), my mistake! > > > >> The finalists are V9.2 (or V11.2 if you prefer upwards) and V3.1 > > > >> Apologies for the confusion! > > > >> > > > >> All the best, > > > >> Emma > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:46 AM Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> I had a good look at the logos and the pigeon version (v3.2 without > > the > > > >>> line around it) has my preference. > > > >>> That said I'm totally fine if we use the v9.2 which also looks > > awesome. > > > >>> > > > >>> Niels > > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:37 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> All of this is amazing -- it's really awesome for me to hear your > > > >>>> thought processes and arguments for the design. I think we're > > pretty > > > >>>> lucky to have this insight! My apologies for the delay, I just got > > > >>>> back from a vacation following the conference :D > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I wish I had better expressed the positive sentiment we got for the > > > >>>> designs when I was showing them off in person. I passed along the > > > >>>> suggestions because they were interesting, but definitely NOT > > > >>>> presented as mandatory. There will be ZERO hard feelings if we make > > > >>>> our own decision! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I didn't say it in the first mail, but my subjective opinion is to > > > >>>> *disagree* with changing the airplane angle upwards. Paper > > airplanes > > > >>>> that travel well *coast* easily (like Avro data). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I maintain my v9.2 vote! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 6:59 AM David M. Carr <da...@carrclan.us> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Great work on these, Emma. My preference is for V3.2. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 2:37 PM Emma K <emma.a.kel...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I uploaded some new images to the Jira issue here < > > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554> to visually > > > >> capture > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>> suggestions for adjusting the upward angle design. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I wanted to show what it looks like if the upward angle of the > > > >> plane > > > >>>> logo > > > >>>>>> is changed so that the underside is visible. The problem is that > > > >> the > > > >>>> blobby > > > >>>>>> bits of the tail block the underside of the plane when adjusted to > > > >>>> this new > > > >>>>>> angle and make the design less clean and even less obvious as to > > > >> what > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>> icon is, which is why in the original upward design V11.2 I didn't > > > >>> add > > > >>>> any > > > >>>>>> underside and instead opted for a cleaner but more abstract > > > >>>> representation > > > >>>>>> of the plane icon. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I also wanted to show what it looks like if I just rotate the V9.2 > > > >>>> design > > > >>>>>> to an upward angle with no other changes. This also doesn't work, > > > >>>> because > > > >>>>>> the flow of the blobs isn't right for this orientation and the > > > >>>> underside of > > > >>>>>> the plane isn't right for this angle. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> To clarify a bit on what I wrote previously, I said that it was > > > >> valid > > > >>>> and > > > >>>>>> made sense that the marketing booth preferred the upward-angle > > > >>> design. > > > >>>> When > > > >>>>>> I said that, I did not mean to suggest that the upward angle was > > > >>> better > > > >>>>>> than the other designs, what I meant to do was just validate that > > > >> it > > > >>>> was > > > >>>>>> okay for them to have that preference! The thing that's hard about > > > >>>> design > > > >>>>>> is that it's so subjective and everyone will have their own unique > > > >>>> opinions > > > >>>>>> on what looks better. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> But again, I want to make sure that the logo is something that the > > > >>>> *Avro > > > >>>>>> community* loves and agrees upon! I'm worried that the passing > > > >>>> subjective > > > >>>>>> preference of the marketing and publicity office at the Community > > > >>> Over > > > >>>> Code > > > >>>>>> conference is casting its own 'shadow vote' here which is taking > > > >> away > > > >>>> from > > > >>>>>> the gut feelings of the Avro community as a whole. I would just > > > >> like > > > >>> to > > > >>>>>> encourage everyone to pick the design they like best in the final > > > >>> vote, > > > >>>>>> because at the end of the day, the logo that's chosen will > > > >> ultimately > > > >>>> be > > > >>>>>> what represents Avro the project, and you as the contributors, not > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>> marketing and publicity office. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> To conclude, I don't think I'll be doing any additional revisions > > > >> of > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>> icons themselves in the future, so the options for the logos will > > > >> be > > > >>>> V9.2 > > > >>>>>> (or V.11.2 if you want an upward angle) and V3.2. I will be > > > >> uploading > > > >>>> some > > > >>>>>> revisions for the font used in the final design (once a winner is > > > >>>> chosen) > > > >>>>>> to see if there is a better alternative on that front, but > > > >> otherwise, > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>> icon designs themselves will remain the same. Thanks again for all > > > >>> your > > > >>>>>> patience and feedback throughout the process! > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> All my best, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Emma > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:22 AM Fokko Driesprong < > > fo...@apache.org > > > >>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Great work again! > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Based on what I was taught when studying graphic design, icons > > > >>> for > > > >>>>>> logos > > > >>>>>>>> should be memorable and have the simplest possible design to > > > >>>> convey the > > > >>>>>>>> desired image > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks for the background information Emma, this makes a lot of > > > >>>> sense to > > > >>>>>>> me. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> This is, I believe, because the angle of V11.2 hides the > > > >> underside: > > > >>>> this > > > >>>>>>>> makes the plane look incomplete. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I agree, it is not obvious that it is a paper plane (which I like > > > >>> as > > > >>>> a > > > >>>>>>> reference, because of childhood :) Both the pigeon and the paper > > > >>>> plane > > > >>>>>> are > > > >>>>>>> awesome. Maybe the plane is a bit more timeless, while the pigeon > > > >>>> might > > > >>>>>>> bring up IP over Avian Carriers > > > >>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers>. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I'll vote for V9.2 pointing slightly upwards as well. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Kind regards, > > > >>>>>>> Fokko > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Op di 17 okt 2023 om 14:54 schreef Oscar Westra van Holthe - > > > >> Kind < > > > >>>>>>> opw...@apache.org>: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> The results yesterday show that V9.2 is perceived as better > > > >> than > > > >>>> V11.2, > > > >>>>>>>> despite being angled downward. This is, I believe, because the > > > >>>> angle of > > > >>>>>>>> V11.2 hides the underside: this makes the plane look > > > >> incomplete. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> My vote is for V9.2 if changed to fly upward, V3.1 otherwise. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Kind regards, > > > >>>>>>>> Oscar > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 21:46, Emma K <emma.a.kel...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you for your kind words throughout the process and > > > >> vote! > > > >>> I > > > >>>>>> wanted > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>> refrain from jumping in earlier lest I accidentally > > > >> influenced > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>>> initial > > > >>>>>>>>> vote in any way! > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Just wanted to hop in now and give my thoughts on the > > > >>> suggestions > > > >>>>>> Ryan > > > >>>>>>>>> received at the Community Over Code conference and Oscar's > > > >>>> suggestion > > > >>>>>>> of > > > >>>>>>>>> another possible upwards variant. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I'll start with Oscar's suggestion first, which also ties > > > >> into > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>> first > > > >>>>>>>>> point of advice Ryan received from the marketing and > > > >> publicity > > > >>>>>> office. > > > >>>>>>> If > > > >>>>>>>>> we'd like to follow ASF's marketing team's intuition that the > > > >>>> upward > > > >>>>>>>> design > > > >>>>>>>>> of 11.2 is better than the downward design of 9.2 I think > > > >>> that's > > > >>>>>> valid > > > >>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> makes sense! If this is the case, then I would suggest we use > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>> 11.2 > > > >>>>>>>>> design rather than the 9.2 design, and I can make some slight > > > >>>>>>> adjustments > > > >>>>>>>>> to the angle of the plane as we see fit. I'll add that I am a > > > >>>> little > > > >>>>>>> more > > > >>>>>>>>> hesitant about this approach only because the 11.2 design did > > > >>> not > > > >>>>>> beat > > > >>>>>>>> out > > > >>>>>>>>> or tie with the votes of design 9.2 in the first round of > > > >>>> voting, and > > > >>>>>>>>> ultimately I would like the final logo to be something that > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>> community > > > >>>>>>>>> as a whole loves and agrees upon! > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The next suggestion Ryan received was based on the PT Mono > > > >> font > > > >>>>>> being a > > > >>>>>>>>> little strange for the word 'Avro' as the r is the only > > > >> serifed > > > >>>>>> letter. > > > >>>>>>>>> This is something I didn't notice before but they are right! > > > >> I > > > >>>>>> actually > > > >>>>>>>>> already have five other fonts on the backburner that I tried > > > >>>> when I > > > >>>>>> was > > > >>>>>>>>> drafting the original design versions but I personally liked > > > >>> the > > > >>>> PT > > > >>>>>>> Mono > > > >>>>>>>>> font the best so gave that as the only option (which in > > > >>> hindsight > > > >>>>>> might > > > >>>>>>>> not > > > >>>>>>>>> have been the best choice). What I can do is once the final > > > >>> icon > > > >>>> is > > > >>>>>>>> chosen > > > >>>>>>>>> as the winner (either the plane or the pigeon) I can draft > > > >> up a > > > >>>> few > > > >>>>>>> more > > > >>>>>>>>> versions with the alternate font choices and we can decide if > > > >>>> one of > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> other fonts will work better in the long run. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Finally, in terms of the last suggestion from the marketing > > > >> and > > > >>>>>>> publicity > > > >>>>>>>>> office of having the word Avro in the plane's dark blue, I > > > >> have > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>> respectfully disagree with this assessment. The area of dark > > > >>>> blue in > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> plane icons is so small that even at large sizes it would be > > > >>>>>> difficult > > > >>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>> read 'Avro' if it was there, and at small sizes, it would be > > > >>>>>> impossible > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>> parse. Based on what I was taught when studying graphic > > > >> design, > > > >>>> icons > > > >>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>> logos should be memorable and have the simplest possible > > > >> design > > > >>>> to > > > >>>>>>> convey > > > >>>>>>>>> the desired image. As an example of this, think of Apple's > > > >>> logo, > > > >>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>> is a > > > >>>>>>>>> simplistic apple icon with a chunk missing. I would posit > > > >> that > > > >>> if > > > >>>>>> Apple > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote 'Apple' on their icon, it wouldn't be nearly as > > > >>> effective. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> That's my 2¢ anyways! I'm happy to make more adjustments to > > > >> the > > > >>>> fonts > > > >>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> the angles of the icons as we see fit, and I'm so excited to > > > >>> see > > > >>>>>> which > > > >>>>>>>>> design will be the final winner in the end! :D > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> All my best, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Emma > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:33 PM Oscar Westra van Holthe - > > > >>> Kind < > > > >>>>>>>>> os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> The results are in: with 6 binding votes (all cast within 6 > > > >>>> hours), > > > >>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> no > > > >>>>>>>>>> non-binding votes, it's a near-tie between V9.2 and V3.1. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> These are the votes: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> - V9.2: 3 votes > > > >>>>>>>>>> - V10.2: 1 vote > > > >>>>>>>>>> - V11.2: 0 votes > > > >>>>>>>>>> - V3.1: 2 votes (I changed the vote for V6.1, as the > > > >> V3.1 > > > >>>>>> variant > > > >>>>>>>> was > > > >>>>>>>>>> part of the vote) > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> What's next: one week to vote by simple majority between > > > >> V9.2 > > > >>>> and > > > >>>>>>> V3.1. > > > >>>>>>>>>> (given our quick votes last time, it's probably more than > > > >>>> enough) > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Then, if we choose for V9.2, perhaps Emma can also create a > > > >>>> good > > > >>>>>>>> version > > > >>>>>>>>>> flying > > > >>>>>>>>>> slightly upward > > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > https://clipart-library.com/newhp/31-316437_transparent-airplane-clipart-paper-airplane-clipart-png-png.png > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> instead > > > >>>>>>>>>> of steeply like V11.2. I think we can leave it up to her > > > >> good > > > >>>>>>> judgement > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>> determine if that's really an improvement. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> So, which do you like more: the plane V9.2, or the pigeon > > > >>> V3.1? > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>> Oscar > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 22:54, Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hello! I don't want to derail the conversation or vote, > > > >> but > > > >>>> I had > > > >>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> opportunity to attend the marketing and publicity office > > > >>>> hours > > > >>>>>>> during > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> community over Code conference. They had some pretty > > > >>> specific > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (but not requirements of course). I'm on my phone but I > > > >>> just > > > >>>> want > > > >>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>> capture them here! > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Plane going up is better than down! > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2. PT Mono is peculiar for our specific word because the > > > >> r > > > >>>> has > > > >>>>>>> serifs > > > >>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the others don't. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 3. If we use the arrow, it would look great to have the > > > >>> word > > > >>>> Avro > > > >>>>>>> in > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> plane's dark blue! > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> It was a neat conversation and they said some really nice > > > >>>> things > > > >>>>>>>> about > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> initiative! > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> If we do anything about 2 or 3, we can talk about any > > > >>>> adjustments > > > >>>>>>>> after > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> vote. To be honest, I'm 100% confident with these current > > > >>>> logos > > > >>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>> leaving > > > >>>>>>>>>>> any changes to Emma's discretion! > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> All my bets Ryan > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023, 13:08 Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> My vote is for 10.2. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:02 AM Oscar Westra van Holthe > > > >> - > > > >>>> Kind < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the start, I've been a fan of the pigeon. It > > > >>> looks > > > >>>>>> good, > > > >>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>> it's > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> very distinctive. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's completely different from any send icon, so > > > >> it > > > >>>>>> cannot > > > >>>>>>> be > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> conflated > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with a message protocol icon. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> My vote is for V3.1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oscar > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <opw...@apache.org > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 🌐 https://github.com/opwvhk/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Op ma 2 okt. 2023 16:47 schreef Ryan Skraba < > > > >>>> r...@skraba.com > > > >>>>>>> : > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can't stop changing my mind, but I'm going to go > > > >>> with > > > >>>>>> V9.2 > > > >>>>>>>> -- I > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really like the pigeon too, but I think the paper > > > >>> plane > > > >>>>>> fits > > > >>>>>>>> too > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> nicely to pass up! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent work, Emma, and thanks Oscar for calling > > > >>> the > > > >>>>>> vote. > > > >>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>>>>> think > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your voting proposal makes sense! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:59 PM Ismaël Mejía < > > > >>>>>>> ieme...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V9.2 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like Fokko I was also not so close to the subject > > > >>>> and it > > > >>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>> great > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the final selection. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It looks so great. Thanks for all the work Emma > > > >> and > > > >>>>>>> everyone! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ismaël > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:23 PM Fokko Driesprong < > > > >>>>>>>>>> fo...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Oscar, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for raising this vote. I wasn't active > > > >> in > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>> conversation > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around the new logo, but I followed it from the > > > >>>>>> sideline. > > > >>>>>>>> The > > > >>>>>>>>>> new > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> logos are > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fantastic. Kudos to Emma. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really like the pigeon, especially the one > > > >> with > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>> envelope! > > > >>>>>>>>>>> My > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> vote > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes to V6.1 if I can't vote on the alternative > > > >>>> version > > > >>>>>>> :) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Fokko > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op ma 2 okt 2023 om 14:14 schreef Oscar Westra > > > >>> van > > > >>>>>>> Holthe - > > > >>>>>>>>>> Kind > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> os...@westravanholthe.nl>: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The past month, there has been new progress > > > >> on > > > >>>> our > > > >>>>>>> search > > > >>>>>>>>>> for a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> new > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> logo ( > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AVRO-3554 < > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ). > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Emma Kellam and the feedback we've all given, > > > >>> we > > > >>>> can > > > >>>>>>> now > > > >>>>>>>>>>> proceed > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote on > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the matter. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are the finalists to choose from (if > > > >> the > > > >>>> image > > > >>>>>> is > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> unreadable, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> links to the comment where the finalists are > > > >>>>>>> announced): > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17770969#comment-17770969 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So now, we can vote. Because a logo lasts > > > >>> longer > > > >>>>>> than a > > > >>>>>>>>>> typical > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rules deviate from the usual rules > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting>: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - the vote lasts 2 weeks > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - to avoid confusion, please vote with the > > > >>>> V... > > > >>>>>>>>>> ifentifier: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> V9.2, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> V10.2, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V11.2, V3.1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - the winner is the logo with at least two > > > >>> (2) > > > >>>>>> votes > > > >>>>>>>>> more > > > >>>>>>>>>>> than > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> runner-up > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - if there is no clear winner, we'll vote > > > >> by > > > >>>>>> simple > > > >>>>>>>>>> majority > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> between the > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> top picks > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote for your preference! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oscar > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind < > > > >>>> opw...@apache.org > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 🌐 https://github.com/opwvhk/ > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan Blue > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tabular > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind < > > > >> os...@westravanholthe.nl> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>> Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> David M. Carr > > > >>>>> da...@carrclan.us > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, > > > >>> > > > >>> Niels Basjes > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl> > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Kulp > > > dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> > > > Qlik - https://qlik.com <https://qlik.com/> > > > > > > > > -- > > ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl>
