v3.1 (non-binding)

Link to the designs in the issue for anyone that needs it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554?focusedCommentId=17770969&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-177709

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:05 AM Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind
<os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR: if you haven't voted yet, please do so!
>
> As Emma has shown that an upwards angle change for V9.2 doesn't work, I
> think we should drop that version from the vote.
>
> This means, with the (binding) votes so far, that the result is a tie:
>
>    - V9.2: 2 votes
>    - V3.1: 2 votes
>
> Note: not everyone who voted the first round has voted again.
>
> *So if you have an opinion on the Avro logo, please vote!*
>
> On a side note: when I count all votes, there is no tie (there's an extra
> vote for v3.1). So if there are no additional votes, we can still have a
> result.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Oscar
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 16:42, Emma K <emma.a.kel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Oops! I realized there is a typo in my last message. I wrote that V3.2 is a
> > finalist (the pigeon without the outlines) instead of V3.1 as a finalist
> > (the pigeon with the outlines), my mistake!
> > The finalists are V9.2 (or V11.2 if you prefer upwards) and V3.1
> > Apologies for the confusion!
> >
> > All the best,
> > Emma
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:46 AM Niels Basjes <ni...@basjes.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I had a good look at the logos and the pigeon version (v3.2 without the
> > > line around it) has my preference.
> > > That said I'm totally fine if we use the v9.2 which also looks awesome.
> > >
> > > Niels
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 2:37 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > All of this is amazing -- it's really awesome for me to hear your
> > > > thought processes and arguments for the design.  I think we're pretty
> > > > lucky to have this insight!  My apologies for the delay, I just got
> > > > back from a vacation following the conference :D
> > > >
> > > > I wish I had better expressed the positive sentiment we got for the
> > > > designs when I was showing them off in person. I passed along the
> > > > suggestions because they were interesting, but definitely NOT
> > > > presented as mandatory. There will be ZERO hard feelings if we make
> > > > our own decision!
> > > >
> > > > I didn't say it in the first mail, but my subjective opinion is to
> > > > *disagree* with changing the airplane angle upwards.  Paper airplanes
> > > > that travel well *coast* easily (like Avro data).
> > > >
> > > > I maintain my v9.2 vote!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 6:59 AM David M. Carr <da...@carrclan.us>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Great work on these, Emma.  My preference is for V3.2.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 2:37 PM Emma K <emma.a.kel...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I uploaded some new images to the Jira issue here <
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554> to visually
> > capture
> > > > the
> > > > > > suggestions for adjusting the upward angle design.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I wanted to show what it looks like if the upward angle of the
> > plane
> > > > logo
> > > > > > is changed so that the underside is visible. The problem is that
> > the
> > > > blobby
> > > > > > bits of the tail block the underside of the plane when adjusted to
> > > > this new
> > > > > > angle and make the design less clean and even less obvious as to
> > what
> > > > the
> > > > > > icon is, which is why in the original upward design V11.2 I didn't
> > > add
> > > > any
> > > > > > underside and instead opted for a cleaner but more abstract
> > > > representation
> > > > > > of the plane icon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I also wanted to show what it looks like if I just rotate the V9.2
> > > > design
> > > > > > to an upward angle with no other changes. This also doesn't work,
> > > > because
> > > > > > the flow of the blobs isn't right for this orientation and the
> > > > underside of
> > > > > > the plane isn't right for this angle.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To clarify a bit on what I wrote previously, I said that it was
> > valid
> > > > and
> > > > > > made sense that the marketing booth preferred the upward-angle
> > > design.
> > > > When
> > > > > > I said that, I did not mean to suggest that the upward angle was
> > > better
> > > > > > than the other designs, what I meant to do was just validate that
> > it
> > > > was
> > > > > > okay for them to have that preference! The thing that's hard about
> > > > design
> > > > > > is that it's so subjective and everyone will have their own unique
> > > > opinions
> > > > > > on what looks better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But again, I want to make sure that the logo is something that the
> > > > *Avro
> > > > > > community* loves and agrees upon! I'm worried that the passing
> > > > subjective
> > > > > > preference of the marketing and publicity office at the Community
> > > Over
> > > > Code
> > > > > > conference is casting its own 'shadow vote' here which is taking
> > away
> > > > from
> > > > > > the gut feelings of the Avro community as a whole. I would just
> > like
> > > to
> > > > > > encourage everyone to pick the design they like best in the final
> > > vote,
> > > > > > because at the end of the day, the logo that's chosen will
> > ultimately
> > > > be
> > > > > > what represents Avro the project, and you as the contributors, not
> > > the
> > > > > > marketing and publicity office.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To conclude, I don't think I'll be doing any additional revisions
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > > > icons themselves in the future, so the options for the logos will
> > be
> > > > V9.2
> > > > > > (or V.11.2 if you want an upward angle) and V3.2. I will be
> > uploading
> > > > some
> > > > > > revisions for the font used in the final design (once a winner is
> > > > chosen)
> > > > > > to see if there is a better alternative on that front, but
> > otherwise,
> > > > the
> > > > > > icon designs themselves will remain the same. Thanks again for all
> > > your
> > > > > > patience and feedback throughout the process!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All my best,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Emma
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 5:22 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Great work again!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Based on what I was taught when studying graphic design, icons
> > > for
> > > > > > logos
> > > > > > > > should be memorable and have the simplest possible design to
> > > > convey the
> > > > > > > > desired image
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the background information Emma, this makes a lot of
> > > > sense to
> > > > > > > me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This is, I believe, because the angle of V11.2 hides the
> > underside:
> > > > this
> > > > > > > > makes the plane look incomplete.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I agree, it is not obvious that it is a paper plane (which I like
> > > as
> > > > a
> > > > > > > reference, because of childhood :) Both the pigeon and the paper
> > > > plane
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > awesome. Maybe the plane is a bit more timeless, while the pigeon
> > > > might
> > > > > > > bring up IP over Avian Carriers
> > > > > > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers>.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'll vote for V9.2 pointing slightly upwards as well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > Fokko
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Op di 17 okt 2023 om 14:54 schreef Oscar Westra van Holthe -
> > Kind <
> > > > > > > opw...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The results yesterday show that V9.2 is perceived as better
> > than
> > > > V11.2,
> > > > > > > > despite being angled downward. This is, I believe, because the
> > > > angle of
> > > > > > > > V11.2 hides the underside: this makes the plane look
> > incomplete.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > My vote is for V9.2 if changed to fly upward, V3.1 otherwise.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > Oscar
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 21:46, Emma K <emma.a.kel...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your kind words throughout the process and
> > vote!
> > > I
> > > > > > wanted
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > refrain from jumping in earlier lest I accidentally
> > influenced
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > initial
> > > > > > > > > vote in any way!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to hop in now and give my thoughts on the
> > > suggestions
> > > > > > Ryan
> > > > > > > > > received at the Community Over Code conference and Oscar's
> > > > suggestion
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > another possible upwards variant.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'll start with Oscar's suggestion first, which also ties
> > into
> > > > the
> > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > point of advice Ryan received from the marketing and
> > publicity
> > > > > > office.
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > we'd like to follow ASF's marketing team's intuition that the
> > > > upward
> > > > > > > > design
> > > > > > > > > of 11.2 is better than the downward design of 9.2 I think
> > > that's
> > > > > > valid
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > makes sense! If this is the case, then I would suggest we use
> > > the
> > > > > > 11.2
> > > > > > > > > design rather than the 9.2 design, and I can make some slight
> > > > > > > adjustments
> > > > > > > > > to the angle of the plane as we see fit. I'll add that I am a
> > > > little
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > hesitant about this approach only because the 11.2 design did
> > > not
> > > > > > beat
> > > > > > > > out
> > > > > > > > > or tie with the votes of design 9.2 in the first round of
> > > > voting, and
> > > > > > > > > ultimately I would like the final logo to be something that
> > the
> > > > > > > community
> > > > > > > > > as a whole loves and agrees upon!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The next suggestion Ryan received was based on the PT Mono
> > font
> > > > > > being a
> > > > > > > > > little strange for the word 'Avro' as the r is the only
> > serifed
> > > > > > letter.
> > > > > > > > > This is something I didn't notice before but they are right!
> > I
> > > > > > actually
> > > > > > > > > already have five other fonts on the backburner that I tried
> > > > when I
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > drafting the original design versions but I personally liked
> > > the
> > > > PT
> > > > > > > Mono
> > > > > > > > > font the best so gave that as the only option (which in
> > > hindsight
> > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > have been the best choice). What I can do is once the final
> > > icon
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > chosen
> > > > > > > > > as the winner (either the plane or the pigeon) I can draft
> > up a
> > > > few
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > versions with the alternate font choices and we can decide if
> > > > one of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > other fonts will work better in the long run.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Finally, in terms of the last suggestion from the marketing
> > and
> > > > > > > publicity
> > > > > > > > > office of having the word Avro in the plane's dark blue, I
> > have
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > > respectfully disagree with this assessment. The area of dark
> > > > blue in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > plane icons is so small that even at large sizes it would be
> > > > > > difficult
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > read 'Avro' if it was there, and at small sizes, it would be
> > > > > > impossible
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > parse. Based on what I was taught when studying graphic
> > design,
> > > > icons
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > logos should be memorable and have the simplest possible
> > design
> > > > to
> > > > > > > convey
> > > > > > > > > the desired image. As an example of this, think of Apple's
> > > logo,
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > > > simplistic apple icon with a chunk missing. I would posit
> > that
> > > if
> > > > > > Apple
> > > > > > > > > wrote 'Apple' on their icon, it wouldn't be nearly as
> > > effective.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That's my 2¢ anyways! I'm happy to make more adjustments to
> > the
> > > > fonts
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > the angles of the icons as we see fit, and I'm so excited to
> > > see
> > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > design will be the final winner in the end! :D
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > All my best,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Emma
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:33 PM Oscar Westra van Holthe -
> > > Kind <
> > > > > > > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The results are in: with 6 binding votes (all cast within 6
> > > > hours),
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > non-binding votes, it's a near-tie between V9.2 and V3.1.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > These are the votes:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >    - V9.2: 3 votes
> > > > > > > > > >    - V10.2: 1 vote
> > > > > > > > > >    - V11.2: 0 votes
> > > > > > > > > >    - V3.1: 2 votes (I changed the vote for V6.1, as the
> > V3.1
> > > > > > variant
> > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > >    part of the vote)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > What's next: one week to vote by simple majority between
> > V9.2
> > > > and
> > > > > > > V3.1.
> > > > > > > > > > (given our quick votes last time, it's probably more than
> > > > enough)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then, if we choose for V9.2, perhaps Emma can also create a
> > > > good
> > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > > > flying
> > > > > > > > > > slightly upward
> > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://clipart-library.com/newhp/31-316437_transparent-airplane-clipart-paper-airplane-clipart-png-png.png
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > instead
> > > > > > > > > > of steeply like V11.2. I think we can leave it up to her
> > good
> > > > > > > judgement
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > determine if that's really an improvement.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So, which do you like more: the plane V9.2, or the pigeon
> > > V3.1?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > > > Oscar
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 22:54, Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello! I don't want to derail the conversation or vote,
> > but
> > > > I had
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > opportunity to attend the marketing and publicity office
> > > > hours
> > > > > > > during
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > community over Code conference. They had some pretty
> > > specific
> > > > > > > > > suggestions
> > > > > > > > > > > (but not requirements of course). I'm on my phone but I
> > > just
> > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > capture them here!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 1. Plane going up is better than down!
> > > > > > > > > > > 2. PT Mono is peculiar for our specific word because the
> > r
> > > > has
> > > > > > > serifs
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > the others don't.
> > > > > > > > > > > 3. If we use the arrow, it would look great to have the
> > > word
> > > > Avro
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > plane's dark blue!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It was a neat conversation and they said some really nice
> > > > things
> > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > initiative!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If we do anything about 2 or 3, we can talk about any
> > > > adjustments
> > > > > > > > after
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > vote. To be honest, I'm 100% confident with these current
> > > > logos
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > leaving
> > > > > > > > > > > any changes to Emma's discretion!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > All my bets Ryan
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023, 13:08 Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > My vote is for 10.2.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 9:02 AM Oscar Westra van Holthe
> > -
> > > > Kind <
> > > > > > > > > > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Since the start, I've been a fan of the pigeon. It
> > > looks
> > > > > > good,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > very distinctive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > And it's completely different from any send icon, so
> > it
> > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > conflated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with a message protocol icon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > My vote is for V3.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Oscar
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <opw...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 🌐 https://github.com/opwvhk/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Op ma 2 okt. 2023 16:47 schreef Ryan Skraba <
> > > > r...@skraba.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't stop changing my mind, but I'm going to go
> > > with
> > > > > > V9.2
> > > > > > > > -- I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > really like the pigeon too, but I think the paper
> > > plane
> > > > > > fits
> > > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nicely to pass up!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent work, Emma, and thanks Oscar for calling
> > > the
> > > > > > vote.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > think
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > your voting proposal makes sense!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ryan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:59 PM Ismaël Mejía <
> > > > > > > ieme...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > V9.2
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like Fokko I was also not so close to the subject
> > > > and it
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > great
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see the final selection.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It looks so great. Thanks for all the work Emma
> > and
> > > > > > > everyone!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ismaël
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:23 PM Fokko Driesprong <
> > > > > > > > > > fo...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Oscar,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for raising this vote. I wasn't active
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > conversation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > around the new logo, but I followed it from the
> > > > > > sideline.
> > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > logos are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fantastic. Kudos to Emma.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I really like the pigeon, especially the one
> > with
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > envelope!
> > > > > > > > > > > My
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vote
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes to V6.1 if I can't vote on the alternative
> > > > version
> > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Fokko
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Op ma 2 okt 2023 om 14:14 schreef Oscar Westra
> > > van
> > > > > > > Holthe -
> > > > > > > > > > Kind
> > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The past month, there has been new progress
> > on
> > > > our
> > > > > > > search
> > > > > > > > > > for a
> > > > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > logo (
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AVRO-3554 <
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554
> > > > > > > > > > >).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Emma Kellam and the feedback we've all given,
> > > we
> > > > can
> > > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > > > > proceed
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vote on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the matter.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are the finalists to choose from (if
> > the
> > > > image
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > unreadable,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > links to the comment where the finalists are
> > > > > > > announced):
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17770969#comment-17770969
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So now, we can vote. Because a logo lasts
> > > longer
> > > > > > than a
> > > > > > > > > > typical
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the rules deviate from the usual rules
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting>:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    - the vote lasts 2 weeks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    - to avoid confusion, please vote with the
> > > > V...
> > > > > > > > > > ifentifier:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > V9.2,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > V10.2,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    V11.2, V3.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    - the winner is the logo with at least two
> > > (2)
> > > > > > votes
> > > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    runner-up
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    - if there is no clear winner, we'll vote
> > by
> > > > > > simple
> > > > > > > > > > majority
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > between the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >    top picks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for your preference!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oscar
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <
> > > > opw...@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 🌐 https://github.com/opwvhk/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > Ryan Blue
> > > > > > > > > > > > Tabular
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <
> > os...@westravanholthe.nl>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > David M. Carr
> > > > > da...@carrclan.us
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groeten,
> > >
> > > Niels Basjes
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl>

Reply via email to