On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:54PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/10/2015 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>While I do agree a formal process to bless tweets would be way too heavy,
> >>sharing the account password would not address the same issues that a proper
> >>guideline would.
> >>Without guidelines, we could end up with self-contradicting tweets, or too
> >>much deletion. All of it with little or no accountability or explanation and
> >>we would end up re-playing the same threads about what can be tweeted from
> >>our PMC's account.
> >Same hypothetical can be applied to commits. It doesn't seem to happen
> >in practice. Hence I'm not worried about it.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Roman.
> 
> Commits are audit-able.
> Also commits are labeled as commited from the commiter rather than the PMC
> And last, what I prefer about commits is they don't deal with opinions :)
> 
I wish you were right on this :(

Reply via email to