On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 03/10/2015 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> While I do agree a formal process to bless tweets would be way too heavy, >>> sharing the account password would not address the same issues that a >>> proper >>> guideline would. >>> Without guidelines, we could end up with self-contradicting tweets, or >>> too >>> much deletion. All of it with little or no accountability or explanation >>> and >>> we would end up re-playing the same threads about what can be tweeted >>> from >>> our PMC's account. >> >> Same hypothetical can be applied to commits. It doesn't seem to happen >> in practice. Hence I'm not worried about it. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. > > > Commits are audit-able.
So are tweets if you want them to. > Also commits are labeled as commited from the commiter rather than the PMC That's a good point, although in practice I don't think it'll make much difference. > And last, what I prefer about commits is they don't deal with opinions :) ;-) Thanks, Roman.
