I don't see the issue with committers having full access to our twitter
account. This is no different than being able to update our website.
Furthermore Apache CloudStack does give them access to it.
Thanks,
Bruno
On 03/11/2015 11:55 AM, Jay Vyas wrote:
Hi cos, good point --- and yes Of course - I was Just voicing my general
thoughts on the subject.
In general I think sharing It amongst commiters at least probably isn't a
particularly dangerous thing to do.
On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote:
Jay,
as you know PMC is a legally bound entity. As such we might be responsible for
certain things happening in the community. Let's not rush any steps unless
they are discussed and approved by PMC.
Cos
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:43AM, jay vyas wrote:
im open to sharing the password with anyone in the community who is a
trusted and responsible bigtop contributor, such as yourself mark. I
really have very little concern that the privilige will be abused.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Mark Grover <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am glad we are having a conversation about this, this is an important
subject.
Seems like there is some disagreement in how we want to deal with social
media - CTR, guidelines, etc.. Why don't we have a vote to decide? That's
what voting is there for anyways, right?:-)
Also sounds like the password will be shared within the PMC so perhaps, a
PMC vote makes more sense? I am not a member of the PMC so I won't start or
cast a vote but will share my opinion as a member of the community. I
really see no downside to having guidelines. In fact, that way, we will
have something we can refer to both within the project and outside the
project and it makes us more transparent as a community. It will be an
iterative process but I think it will be a great first step. And, since
Bruno seems to have some interest in that direction (correct me if I am
wrong, Bruno), why not we request Bruno to put together some concrete set
of guidelines that folks can vote on?
Mark
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/10/2015 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote:
While I do agree a formal process to bless tweets would be way too
heavy,
sharing the account password would not address the same issues that a
proper
guideline would.
Without guidelines, we could end up with self-contradicting tweets,
or
too
much deletion. All of it with little or no accountability or
explanation
and
we would end up re-playing the same threads about what can be tweeted
from
our PMC's account.
Same hypothetical can be applied to commits. It doesn't seem to happen
in practice. Hence I'm not worried about it.
Thanks,
Roman.
Commits are audit-able.
So are tweets if you want them to.
Also commits are labeled as commited from the commiter rather than the
PMC
That's a good point, although in practice I don't think it'll make much
difference.
And last, what I prefer about commits is they don't deal with opinions
:)
;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
--
jay vyas
