Jay, as you know PMC is a legally bound entity. As such we might be responsible for certain things happening in the community. Let's not rush any steps unless they are discussed and approved by PMC.
Cos On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:43AM, jay vyas wrote: > im open to sharing the password with anyone in the community who is a > trusted and responsible bigtop contributor, such as yourself mark. I > really have very little concern that the privilige will be abused. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Mark Grover <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I am glad we are having a conversation about this, this is an important > > subject. > > > > Seems like there is some disagreement in how we want to deal with social > > media - CTR, guidelines, etc.. Why don't we have a vote to decide? That's > > what voting is there for anyways, right?:-) > > > > Also sounds like the password will be shared within the PMC so perhaps, a > > PMC vote makes more sense? I am not a member of the PMC so I won't start or > > cast a vote but will share my opinion as a member of the community. I > > really see no downside to having guidelines. In fact, that way, we will > > have something we can refer to both within the project and outside the > > project and it makes us more transparent as a community. It will be an > > iterative process but I think it will be a great first step. And, since > > Bruno seems to have some interest in that direction (correct me if I am > > wrong, Bruno), why not we request Bruno to put together some concrete set > > of guidelines that folks can vote on? > > > > Mark > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 03/10/2015 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> While I do agree a formal process to bless tweets would be way too > > > heavy, > > > >>> sharing the account password would not address the same issues that a > > > >>> proper > > > >>> guideline would. > > > >>> Without guidelines, we could end up with self-contradicting tweets, > > or > > > >>> too > > > >>> much deletion. All of it with little or no accountability or > > > explanation > > > >>> and > > > >>> we would end up re-playing the same threads about what can be tweeted > > > >>> from > > > >>> our PMC's account. > > > >> > > > >> Same hypothetical can be applied to commits. It doesn't seem to happen > > > >> in practice. Hence I'm not worried about it. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > > Commits are audit-able. > > > > > > So are tweets if you want them to. > > > > > > > Also commits are labeled as commited from the commiter rather than the > > > PMC > > > > > > That's a good point, although in practice I don't think it'll make much > > > difference. > > > > > > > And last, what I prefer about commits is they don't deal with opinions > > :) > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > -- > jay vyas
