im open to sharing the password with anyone in the community who is a trusted and responsible bigtop contributor, such as yourself mark. I really have very little concern that the privilige will be abused.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Mark Grover <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I am glad we are having a conversation about this, this is an important > subject. > > Seems like there is some disagreement in how we want to deal with social > media - CTR, guidelines, etc.. Why don't we have a vote to decide? That's > what voting is there for anyways, right?:-) > > Also sounds like the password will be shared within the PMC so perhaps, a > PMC vote makes more sense? I am not a member of the PMC so I won't start or > cast a vote but will share my opinion as a member of the community. I > really see no downside to having guidelines. In fact, that way, we will > have something we can refer to both within the project and outside the > project and it makes us more transparent as a community. It will be an > iterative process but I think it will be a great first step. And, since > Bruno seems to have some interest in that direction (correct me if I am > wrong, Bruno), why not we request Bruno to put together some concrete set > of guidelines that folks can vote on? > > Mark > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 03/10/2015 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > >> > > >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Bruno Mahé <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> While I do agree a formal process to bless tweets would be way too > > heavy, > > >>> sharing the account password would not address the same issues that a > > >>> proper > > >>> guideline would. > > >>> Without guidelines, we could end up with self-contradicting tweets, > or > > >>> too > > >>> much deletion. All of it with little or no accountability or > > explanation > > >>> and > > >>> we would end up re-playing the same threads about what can be tweeted > > >>> from > > >>> our PMC's account. > > >> > > >> Same hypothetical can be applied to commits. It doesn't seem to happen > > >> in practice. Hence I'm not worried about it. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Roman. > > > > > > > > > Commits are audit-able. > > > > So are tweets if you want them to. > > > > > Also commits are labeled as commited from the commiter rather than the > > PMC > > > > That's a good point, although in practice I don't think it'll make much > > difference. > > > > > And last, what I prefer about commits is they don't deal with opinions > :) > > > > ;-) > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > > -- jay vyas
