Great, I would be happy to do this new migration (already have the privileges needed on the github organisation). However I will wait an additional 72h just to see if there are any objections :-)
// Pontus On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 at 09:40 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Yeah sure I think re-creating the code on github with latest from > google code, and then add those PR's commits that are extra on github > today could be the way forward. > > As we take the latest code from camel-extra then we are sure we have > all the bits that people are using today from the official releases. > > About the extra mailing lists. I would actually prefer to not > duplicate all the setup for extra, but just use this mailing list, and > then the github issue tracker for the extra tickets. By using this > mailing list then its much easier to share knowledge of the extra > project. I dont think people bother to signup on endless number of > mailing lists. > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Any thoughts or comments on this ? > > > > As I wrote above the two code bases has diverged but since the latest > > official release has been made from the google code repo I think it > would > > be best to treat this as the official repository and recreate the gihub > > repo with a new import to from google code. > > > > Should we have a vote on this ? Or should this issue be handled on the > > camel-extra mailing list instead ? > > > > Best regards > > Pontus Ullgren > > > > > > > > On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 at 00:13 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> A short update. > >> Looked through the commits in the google code repo and github and as a > >> feared the two code bases has diverged with commits being done to both > >> places. > >> > >> However I think I managed to juggle the commits for the master branch so > >> that the result is something that is acceptable. I have yet to run tests > >> and make sure things work as expected. > >> > >> I have not yet started looking into merging in the changes for the > 2.13.x, > >> 2.14.x and 2.15.x. > >> > >> However looking at the commit in github it seems to mainly be the > >> contribution of Camel IBM CICS and Camel WMQ component. Both which I > find a > >> bit strange that they were even added to camel-extra since they have > >> dependencies to libraries that are not publicly accessible, and must be > >> locally installed. So these will never be able to build and test in the > CI > >> environment. Also I'm not sure about the possible licensing issues for > >> these components. And will we be able to release them if the person in > >> charge of the release does not have access to the closed source > libraries ? > >> > >> So a possible, much simpler, way forward would be to rename the current > >> github camel-extra repo, create a new and simply re-import from the > current > >> google code repo. > >> > >> We could then sit down and move over the commits that makes sense from > the > >> once that was done on github. > >> > >> Comments ? > >> > >> // Pontus > >> > >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 at 15:51 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, camel-extra copied to github quite some time ago. However after > that > >>> there was a period of uncertainty during which more commits and even > >>> releases where made from the Google code repo up until the point where > >>> google shutdown there service. > >>> > >>> As time has gone by it seems that there is a risk that the code bases > has > >>> diverge. > >>> Is there anybody already looking into this? If not I would be happy to > >>> try to make sure that the latest code from Google code is synced to the > >>> github.com repositories. > >>> > >>> Regarding SF from the latest ComDev discussions it turns out that, at > >>> least to my interpretation, it is up to each PMC to decide where and > what > >>> they want to do with their extras project. Nothing will be > automatically > >>> moved by apache infra. > >>> > >>> Best regards > >>> > >>> Pontus > >>> > >>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, 14:42 David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> https://github.com/camel-extra/camel-extra > >>>> > >>>> 2015-10-31 14:01 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak < > >>>> krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com>: > >>>> > Hi JB > >>>> > > >>>> > I have seen the discussion that Camel Extras is going to move to > >>>> Github. I thought it's done already. Have you already final descision > about > >>>> Camel Extras? I have seen discussion on ComDev about moving to SF but > the > >>>> projects will be not forced to move together to SF. As i have seen > Camel > >>>> prefers Github. I'm looking for > >>>> > instructions how to migrate the svn repo to git and I thought Camel > >>>> has already finished this process. > >>>> > > >>>> > Kindly regards > >>>> > Krzysztof > >>>> > > >>>> > On 31.10.2015 13:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >>>> >> Hi Krysztof, > >>>> >> > >>>> >> camel-extras are not on github right. I've done some cleanups and > >>>> upgrades. > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Regards > >>>> >> JB > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On 10/29/2015 08:15 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: > >>>> >>> Hi > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Have you already performed the migration to Github? Have you done > it > >>>> alone? I assume Infra doesn't support this process? > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Regards > >>>> >>> Krzysztof > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> On 17.09.2015 21:00, Pontus Ullgren wrote: > >>>> >>>> I believe changing the package name would be a real problem for > >>>> users of > >>>> >>>> the library. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> Not sure why we can not continue to use that package name since > >>>> according > >>>> >>>> to the answers Raul got on the com-dev mailinglist [1] it is up > to > >>>> each > >>>> >>>> projects PMC to decide how there extras project should be > handled. > >>>> >>>> So if the Camel PMC decided that the Camel Extras source code > >>>> should be > >>>> >>>> hosted on github I do not see any problem to keep the package > name > >>>> as is. > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> [1] > >>>> >>>> > >>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccadmm+kcy9c6rgodshexgsrduu7jur06jwcs9yp-hc8mapm6...@mail.gmail.com%3E > >>>> >>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 at 13:57 Christian Müller < > >>>> christian.muel...@gmail.com> > >>>> >>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>>> I'm also not happy with the support/guidance from dev@community > >>>> regarding > >>>> >>>>> this topic and +1 to move to Github now. I'm not convinced from > SF. > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> Before we are releasing our first release there, please check > with > >>>> the > >>>> >>>>> Apache trademarks first, whether you can still use the name > "Camel > >>>> Extra" > >>>> >>>>> or not. The same for the package name (it has apache and camel > in > >>>> it), > >>>> >>>>> because this project doesn't belong to Apache Extra anymore in > the > >>>> future, > >>>> >>>>> in my opinion. > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> Best, > >>>> >>>>> Christian > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> >>>>> Am 17.09.2015 10:43 schrieb "Raul Kripalani" <r...@evosent.com > >: > >>>> >>>>>> Agree. From my point of view, if the Camel extras community > feels > >>>> >>>>>> comfortable with Github, then go for it. It seems like the > joint > >>>> Apache > >>>> >>>>>> Extras effort has somewhat disintegrated anyway. > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> We did our part: having a discussion there and sharing our > >>>> concerns at > >>>> >>>>>> dev@community. So I'm happy with how we dealt with this issue. > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> Let us know when it's done so we can update the links on the > >>>> Apache Camel > >>>> >>>>>> website. > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> Raúl. > >>>> >>>>>> On 17 Sep 2015 07:50, "Pontus Ullgren" <ullg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> Hello again, > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> So I tried to reach out to com-dev beginning this month[1] and > >>>> it seems > >>>> >>>>> to > >>>> >>>>>>> be a dead end. > >>>> >>>>>>> Some answers[2] even suggest that it is up to the PMCs. > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> So in line of the two previous votes[3] [4] I think we should > go > >>>> ahead > >>>> >>>>> and > >>>> >>>>>>> continue the move to github. > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> Best regards > >>>> >>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> [1] > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCABe1WL-mcFvPUmUwjLXmgLUOSSQUrhT5z7Adj2WPVS8NwSQnuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > >>>> >>>>>>> [2] > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccadmm+kcy9c6rgodshexgsrduu7jur06jwcs9yp-hc8mapm6...@mail.gmail.com%3E > >>>> >>>>>>> [3] > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/camel-dev/201504.mbox/%3C1391078472.16070484.1428686018450.JavaMail.zimbra%40redhat.com%3E > >>>> >>>>>>> [4] > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/camel-dev/201504.mbox/%3C301126299.246793.1429101018000.JavaMail.zimbra%40redhat.com%3E > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 19:54 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> While I personally think that is github is superior to what > SF > >>>> offers > >>>> >>>>>>>> (and that bitbucket is superior to github) for camel-extra I > >>>> don't > >>>> >>>>> think > >>>> >>>>>>>> the choice of hosting company is that big a deal. > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> Camel-Extra currently uses > >>>> >>>>>>>> * Mailing list provided by nabble ( > >>>> >>>>>>>> http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/) > >>>> >>>>>>>> * Jenkins provided by cloudbees ( > >>>> >>>>> https://camel-extra.ci.cloudbees.com/ > >>>> >>>>> ) > >>>> >>>>>>>> * SonarQube provided by SonarQube ( > >>>> >>>>>>>> http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/564228) > >>>> >>>>>>>> * Jira for issues provided by Atlassian ( > >>>> >>>>>>>> https://camel-extra.atlassian.net/browse/CAMEX) > >>>> >>>>>>>> * End user component documentations are hosted on the main > camel > >>>> >>>>> project > >>>> >>>>>>>> wiki > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> So even back when we where on google code the only thing that > >>>> it was > >>>> >>>>> used > >>>> >>>>>>>> for was to > >>>> >>>>>>>> provide a wiki for some project specific documentation such > as > >>>> >>>>> release > >>>> >>>>>>>> notes and most important > >>>> >>>>>>>> the GIT repo. > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> So as long as the service provider provides git, a simple > way of > >>>> >>>>> hosting > >>>> >>>>>>>> some documentation and > >>>> >>>>>>>> has a good reputation of keeping a good uptime on the service > >>>> in my > >>>> >>>>>>>> opinion it is not that big a deal > >>>> >>>>>>>> where or what is hosting it. The important thing is that we > get > >>>> this > >>>> >>>>> up > >>>> >>>>>>>> read-write ASAP. > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> Just my $0.02 > >>>> >>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 17:59 Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com > > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Rob, > >>>> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>> I think camel-extras belongs to the Apache Extras [1] > >>>> umbrella... > >>>> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>> That said, I'm not quite sure what's the point of grouping > all > >>>> >>>>> "extras" > >>>> >>>>>>>>> from all projects under a common ASF umbrella – I'm assuming > >>>> it's > >>>> >>>>> for > >>>> >>>>>>> ASF > >>>> >>>>>>>>> organisational reasons. It definitely doesn't serve a > technical > >>>> >>>>> reason > >>>> >>>>>>> nor > >>>> >>>>>>>>> an administrative one: (a) each Extras project is more > closely > >>>> >>>>> related > >>>> >>>>>>> to > >>>> >>>>>>>>> the parent than to all other Extras project in ASF and (b) > the > >>>> roles > >>>> >>>>> in > >>>> >>>>>>>>> the > >>>> >>>>>>>>> camel-extras "organisation" do show some correlation with > the > >>>> roles > >>>> >>>>> at > >>>> >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel, but they are not necessarily tied together, > i.e. > >>>> >>>>> there's > >>>> >>>>>>> no > >>>> >>>>>>>>> requirement that a committer in camel-extras has to be a > >>>> committer > >>>> >>>>> in > >>>> >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel, right? > >>>> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html > >>>> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>> >>>>>>>>> Raúl. > >>>> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Rob Davies < > >>>> rajdav...@gmail.com> > >>>> >>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> The way I read it is comdev are doing a mass migration to > SF > >>>> - its > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> understandable they wouldn’t want multiple targets - so to > >>>> pick > >>>> >>>>> one > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> destination for the code move makes sense. However its not > >>>> clear > >>>> >>>>> that > >>>> >>>>>>> we > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t just > move > >>>> it > >>>> >>>>> to > >>>> >>>>>>>>> GitHub > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ourselves ? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pontus Ullgren < > ullg...@gmail.com> > >>>> >>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Victor and David: You are welcome to join the com-dev > mailing > >>>> >>>>> list > >>>> >>>>>>> and > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> enlighten them. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here is a link the latest answer on that question :-) > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201507.mbox/%3CBY2PR03MB490B6943E12F5D925203A2E99900%40BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 16:01 David Karlsen < > >>>> >>>>> davidkarl...@gmail.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why not github? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 4. sep. 2015 3:54 p.m. skrev "Victor NOËL" < > >>>> >>>>>>> victor.n...@linagora.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> : > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member of > an > >>>> >>>>> Apache > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Project > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ;) could tell them before they take the wrong decision? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's even worse than what I thought because after the > Gimp > >>>> >>>>> people > >>>> >>>>>>>>> told > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> SF > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to stop doing their shady things, they actually insisted > >>>> >>>>> during > >>>> >>>>>>>>> 2015: > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Victor > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit : > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the > Apache > >>>> >>>>> Extras > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories are governed by the ASF and the consensus > >>>> seems > >>>> >>>>> to > >>>> >>>>>>>>> point > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> to > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SF > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather than Github (which would have been my personal > >>>> >>>>> preference) > >>>> >>>>>>>>> or > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bitbucket. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise > >>>> Architect, > >>>> >>>>> Open > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Source > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Integration specialist > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL < > >>>> >>>>>>>>> victor.n...@linagora.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge is a > good > >>>> >>>>>>>>> solution? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour by > >>>> >>>>> implanting > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> adware > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other spyware in installers available to download > there. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It became known with the big complain of the Gimp > project > >>>> >>>>> (that > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wasn't > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even fixed by SourceForge…). > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for details. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Victor > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we not already have volunteers in the current set > of > >>>> >>>>>>>>> contributors > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the project ? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the > project > >>>> >>>>> once > >>>> >>>>>>> it > >>>> >>>>>>>>> has > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moved (where ever it is moved). > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the question right now is the progress of > the SF > >>>> >>>>>>>>> migration. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek < > >>>> >>>>> hekon...@gmail.com> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are > being > >>>> >>>>> moved to > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> the... > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer willing > to > >>>> >>>>>>> maintain > >>>> >>>>>>>>> the > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after SourceForge migration. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers! > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus Ullgren < > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ullg...@gmail.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev > mailing > >>>> list > >>>> >>>>> no. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno (that > >>>> seems > >>>> >>>>> to be > >>>> >>>>>>>>> in > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charge > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the move) to get a status update for camel-extra. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani < > >>>> >>>>> r...@evosent.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys, > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about the > >>>> Apache > >>>> >>>>>>> Extras > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users are asking for new releases of camel-extras > >>>> >>>>>>> components... > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but > found no > >>>> >>>>>>>>> conclusion. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe I > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things tend to > get > >>>> >>>>> very > >>>> >>>>>>>>> chatty > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion > email. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise > >>>> >>>>> Architect, > >>>> >>>>>>>>> Open > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Integration specialist > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus Ullgren < > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ullg...@gmail.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel Gruno > is > >>>> the > >>>> >>>>> one > >>>> >>>>>>> in > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> charge > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the move. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the > >>>> progress > >>>> >>>>> or > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> roadmap. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] seem to > >>>> be a > >>>> >>>>>>>>> option in > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this discussion to > the > >>>> >>>>>>>>> camel-dev > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailinglist. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph > Emmersberger < > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any date when this move is expected? We > >>>> have > >>>> >>>>> still > >>>> >>>>>>>>> the > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backup > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plan > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Github in place, ... > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus Ullgren > < > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ullg...@gmail.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diging through the community development list > shows > >>>> >>>>> that it > >>>> >>>>>>>>> will > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moved > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the apache > >>>> extra. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren < > >>>> >>>>> ullg...@gmail.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev list[1][2] > >>>> and > >>>> >>>>> the > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any > >>>> >>>>> conclusion on > >>>> >>>>>>>>> this > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >>>> >>>>> > >>>> > http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to switch > to > >>>> read > >>>> >>>>>>> only > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ( > >>>> >>>>>>>>> https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondered > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras stuff? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Henryk Konsek > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/hekonsek > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, > >>>> développée > >>>> >>>>> et > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> supportée > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> par Linagora. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une > offre > >>>> >>>>>>>>> entreprise. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, > >>>> développée > >>>> >>>>> et > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> supportée > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> par Linagora. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une > offre > >>>> >>>>>>>>> entreprise. > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>>>>>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >> > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > >>>> > > >>>> > JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect > >>>> > Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/) > >>>> > Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member ( > >>>> http://servicemix.apache.org/) > >>>> > Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC ( > >>>> http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/) > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> -- > >>>> David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen > >>>> > >>> > > > > -- > Claus Ibsen > ----------------- > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >
