OK so the new imported repo was trashed I guess due to some forced push. I will make a new try to fix this later. Could you please wait with pushing commits for the time beeing.
// Pontus On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 at 16:51 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > The camel-extra repo from google code has been reimported to a new repo on > github. > The previous import has been renamed to camel-extra-firstimport but I > could not find any easy way to make it read only. > > What is left is to reapply the patches I will get onto that during the > weekend. > > Best regards > Pontus Ullgren > > > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 at 11:16 David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That sounds good so we don't loose anything. Can I additionally >> suggest that the old repo get's closed/set readonly or something after >> the move so we don't end up here again? >> Keeping the mailinglist seems reasonable as extra will be very low >> traffic - and then easier to notice when using same communication >> channels etc >> >> 2015-11-11 9:43 GMT+01:00 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com>: >> > Great, >> > >> > I would be happy to do this new migration (already have the privileges >> > needed on the github organisation). >> > However I will wait an additional 72h just to see if there are any >> > objections :-) >> > >> > // Pontus >> > >> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 at 09:40 Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi >> >> >> >> Yeah sure I think re-creating the code on github with latest from >> >> google code, and then add those PR's commits that are extra on github >> >> today could be the way forward. >> >> >> >> As we take the latest code from camel-extra then we are sure we have >> >> all the bits that people are using today from the official releases. >> >> >> >> About the extra mailing lists. I would actually prefer to not >> >> duplicate all the setup for extra, but just use this mailing list, and >> >> then the github issue tracker for the extra tickets. By using this >> >> mailing list then its much easier to share knowledge of the extra >> >> project. I dont think people bother to signup on endless number of >> >> mailing lists. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > >> >> > Any thoughts or comments on this ? >> >> > >> >> > As I wrote above the two code bases has diverged but since the latest >> >> > official release has been made from the google code repo I think it >> >> would >> >> > be best to treat this as the official repository and recreate the >> gihub >> >> > repo with a new import to from google code. >> >> > >> >> > Should we have a vote on this ? Or should this issue be handled on >> the >> >> > camel-extra mailing list instead ? >> >> > >> >> > Best regards >> >> > Pontus Ullgren >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 at 00:13 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> A short update. >> >> >> Looked through the commits in the google code repo and github and >> as a >> >> >> feared the two code bases has diverged with commits being done to >> both >> >> >> places. >> >> >> >> >> >> However I think I managed to juggle the commits for the master >> branch so >> >> >> that the result is something that is acceptable. I have yet to run >> tests >> >> >> and make sure things work as expected. >> >> >> >> >> >> I have not yet started looking into merging in the changes for the >> >> 2.13.x, >> >> >> 2.14.x and 2.15.x. >> >> >> >> >> >> However looking at the commit in github it seems to mainly be the >> >> >> contribution of Camel IBM CICS and Camel WMQ component. Both which I >> >> find a >> >> >> bit strange that they were even added to camel-extra since they have >> >> >> dependencies to libraries that are not publicly accessible, and >> must be >> >> >> locally installed. So these will never be able to build and test in >> the >> >> CI >> >> >> environment. Also I'm not sure about the possible licensing issues >> for >> >> >> these components. And will we be able to release them if the person >> in >> >> >> charge of the release does not have access to the closed source >> >> libraries ? >> >> >> >> >> >> So a possible, much simpler, way forward would be to rename the >> current >> >> >> github camel-extra repo, create a new and simply re-import from the >> >> current >> >> >> google code repo. >> >> >> >> >> >> We could then sit down and move over the commits that makes sense >> from >> >> the >> >> >> once that was done on github. >> >> >> >> >> >> Comments ? >> >> >> >> >> >> // Pontus >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 at 15:51 Pontus Ullgren <ullg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Yes, camel-extra copied to github quite some time ago. However >> after >> >> that >> >> >>> there was a period of uncertainty during which more commits and >> even >> >> >>> releases where made from the Google code repo up until the point >> where >> >> >>> google shutdown there service. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> As time has gone by it seems that there is a risk that the code >> bases >> >> has >> >> >>> diverge. >> >> >>> Is there anybody already looking into this? If not I would be >> happy to >> >> >>> try to make sure that the latest code from Google code is synced >> to the >> >> >>> github.com repositories. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Regarding SF from the latest ComDev discussions it turns out that, >> at >> >> >>> least to my interpretation, it is up to each PMC to decide where >> and >> >> what >> >> >>> they want to do with their extras project. Nothing will be >> >> automatically >> >> >>> moved by apache infra. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Best regards >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Pontus >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015, 14:42 David Karlsen <davidkarl...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> https://github.com/camel-extra/camel-extra >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> 2015-10-31 14:01 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak < >> >> >>>> krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com>: >> >> >>>> > Hi JB >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > I have seen the discussion that Camel Extras is going to move to >> >> >>>> Github. I thought it's done already. Have you already final >> descision >> >> about >> >> >>>> Camel Extras? I have seen discussion on ComDev about moving to SF >> but >> >> the >> >> >>>> projects will be not forced to move together to SF. As i have seen >> >> Camel >> >> >>>> prefers Github. I'm looking for >> >> >>>> > instructions how to migrate the svn repo to git and I thought >> Camel >> >> >>>> has already finished this process. >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > Kindly regards >> >> >>>> > Krzysztof >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > On 31.10.2015 13:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> >>>> >> Hi Krysztof, >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> camel-extras are not on github right. I've done some cleanups >> and >> >> >>>> upgrades. >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> Regards >> >> >>>> >> JB >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> On 10/29/2015 08:15 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: >> >> >>>> >>> Hi >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> Have you already performed the migration to Github? Have you >> done >> >> it >> >> >>>> alone? I assume Infra doesn't support this process? >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> Regards >> >> >>>> >>> Krzysztof >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> On 17.09.2015 21:00, Pontus Ullgren wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>> I believe changing the package name would be a real problem >> for >> >> >>>> users of >> >> >>>> >>>> the library. >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>>> Not sure why we can not continue to use that package name >> since >> >> >>>> according >> >> >>>> >>>> to the answers Raul got on the com-dev mailinglist [1] it is >> up >> >> to >> >> >>>> each >> >> >>>> >>>> projects PMC to decide how there extras project should be >> >> handled. >> >> >>>> >>>> So if the Camel PMC decided that the Camel Extras source code >> >> >>>> should be >> >> >>>> >>>> hosted on github I do not see any problem to keep the package >> >> name >> >> >>>> as is. >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>>> [1] >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccadmm+kcy9c6rgodshexgsrduu7jur06jwcs9yp-hc8mapm6...@mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 at 13:57 Christian Müller < >> >> >>>> christian.muel...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> I'm also not happy with the support/guidance from >> dev@community >> >> >>>> regarding >> >> >>>> >>>>> this topic and +1 to move to Github now. I'm not convinced >> from >> >> SF. >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Before we are releasing our first release there, please >> check >> >> with >> >> >>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>> Apache trademarks first, whether you can still use the name >> >> "Camel >> >> >>>> Extra" >> >> >>>> >>>>> or not. The same for the package name (it has apache and >> camel >> >> in >> >> >>>> it), >> >> >>>> >>>>> because this project doesn't belong to Apache Extra anymore >> in >> >> the >> >> >>>> future, >> >> >>>> >>>>> in my opinion. >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Best, >> >> >>>> >>>>> Christian >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> Am 17.09.2015 10:43 schrieb "Raul Kripalani" < >> r...@evosent.com >> >> >: >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Agree. From my point of view, if the Camel extras community >> >> feels >> >> >>>> >>>>>> comfortable with Github, then go for it. It seems like the >> >> joint >> >> >>>> Apache >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Extras effort has somewhat disintegrated anyway. >> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> We did our part: having a discussion there and sharing our >> >> >>>> concerns at >> >> >>>> >>>>>> dev@community. So I'm happy with how we dealt with this >> issue. >> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Let us know when it's done so we can update the links on >> the >> >> >>>> Apache Camel >> >> >>>> >>>>>> website. >> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>> Raúl. >> >> >>>> >>>>>> On 17 Sep 2015 07:50, "Pontus Ullgren" <ullg...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> Hello again, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> So I tried to reach out to com-dev beginning this >> month[1] and >> >> >>>> it seems >> >> >>>> >>>>> to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> be a dead end. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> Some answers[2] even suggest that it is up to the PMCs. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> So in line of the two previous votes[3] [4] I think we >> should >> >> go >> >> >>>> ahead >> >> >>>> >>>>> and >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> continue the move to github. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> Best regards >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> [1] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCABe1WL-mcFvPUmUwjLXmgLUOSSQUrhT5z7Adj2WPVS8NwSQnuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> [2] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccadmm+kcy9c6rgodshexgsrduu7jur06jwcs9yp-hc8mapm6...@mail.gmail.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> [3] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/camel-dev/201504.mbox/%3C1391078472.16070484.1428686018450.JavaMail.zimbra%40redhat.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> [4] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/camel-dev/201504.mbox/%3C301126299.246793.1429101018000.JavaMail.zimbra%40redhat.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 19:54 Pontus Ullgren < >> ullg...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> While I personally think that is github is superior to >> what >> >> SF >> >> >>>> offers >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> (and that bitbucket is superior to github) for >> camel-extra I >> >> >>>> don't >> >> >>>> >>>>> think >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> the choice of hosting company is that big a deal. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> Camel-Extra currently uses >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> * Mailing list provided by nabble ( >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> http://camel-extra.1091541.n5.nabble.com/) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> * Jenkins provided by cloudbees ( >> >> >>>> >>>>> https://camel-extra.ci.cloudbees.com/ >> >> >>>> >>>>> ) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> * SonarQube provided by SonarQube ( >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> http://nemo.sonarqube.org/dashboard/index/564228) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> * Jira for issues provided by Atlassian ( >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> https://camel-extra.atlassian.net/browse/CAMEX) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> * End user component documentations are hosted on the >> main >> >> camel >> >> >>>> >>>>> project >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> wiki >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> So even back when we where on google code the only thing >> that >> >> >>>> it was >> >> >>>> >>>>> used >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> for was to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> provide a wiki for some project specific documentation >> such >> >> as >> >> >>>> >>>>> release >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> notes and most important >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> the GIT repo. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> So as long as the service provider provides git, a simple >> >> way of >> >> >>>> >>>>> hosting >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> some documentation and >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> has a good reputation of keeping a good uptime on the >> service >> >> >>>> in my >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> opinion it is not that big a deal >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> where or what is hosting it. The important thing is that >> we >> >> get >> >> >>>> this >> >> >>>> >>>>> up >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> read-write ASAP. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> Just my $0.02 >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 17:59 Raul Kripalani < >> r...@evosent.com >> >> > >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Rob, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> I think camel-extras belongs to the Apache Extras [1] >> >> >>>> umbrella... >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> That said, I'm not quite sure what's the point of >> grouping >> >> all >> >> >>>> >>>>> "extras" >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> from all projects under a common ASF umbrella – I'm >> assuming >> >> >>>> it's >> >> >>>> >>>>> for >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> ASF >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> organisational reasons. It definitely doesn't serve a >> >> technical >> >> >>>> >>>>> reason >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> nor >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> an administrative one: (a) each Extras project is more >> >> closely >> >> >>>> >>>>> related >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> the parent than to all other Extras project in ASF and >> (b) >> >> the >> >> >>>> roles >> >> >>>> >>>>> in >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> camel-extras "organisation" do show some correlation >> with >> >> the >> >> >>>> roles >> >> >>>> >>>>> at >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel, but they are not necessarily tied >> together, >> >> i.e. >> >> >>>> >>>>> there's >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> no >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> requirement that a committer in camel-extras has to be a >> >> >>>> committer >> >> >>>> >>>>> in >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Apache Camel, right? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Raúl. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Rob Davies < >> >> >>>> rajdav...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> The way I read it is comdev are doing a mass migration >> to >> >> SF >> >> >>>> - its >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> understandable they wouldn’t want multiple targets - >> so to >> >> >>>> pick >> >> >>>> >>>>> one >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> destination for the code move makes sense. However its >> not >> >> >>>> clear >> >> >>>> >>>>> that >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> we >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> have to keep camel-extra at SF - or why we couldn’t >> just >> >> move >> >> >>>> it >> >> >>>> >>>>> to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> GitHub >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ourselves ? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:54, Pontus Ullgren < >> >> ullg...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Victor and David: You are welcome to join the com-dev >> >> mailing >> >> >>>> >>>>> list >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> and >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> enlighten them. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here is a link the latest answer on that question :-) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201507.mbox/%3CBY2PR03MB490B6943E12F5D925203A2E99900%40BY2PR03MB490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 16:01 David Karlsen < >> >> >>>> >>>>> davidkarl...@gmail.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why not github? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 4. sep. 2015 3:54 p.m. skrev "Victor NOËL" < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> victor.n...@linagora.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> : >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they even aware of the problem with sourceforge? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe someone that is known there (such as a member >> of >> >> an >> >> >>>> >>>>> Apache >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Project >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ;) could tell them before they take the wrong >> decision? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's even worse than what I thought because after >> the >> >> Gimp >> >> >>>> >>>>> people >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> told >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> SF >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to stop doing their shady things, they actually >> insisted >> >> >>>> >>>>> during >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> 2015: >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00097.html >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list/2015-May/msg00098.html >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Victor >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2015 15:36, Raul Kripalani a écrit : >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite frankly, SF would be my last resort. But the >> >> Apache >> >> >>>> >>>>> Extras >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories are governed by the ASF and the >> consensus >> >> >>>> seems >> >> >>>> >>>>> to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> point >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> SF >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather than Github (which would have been my >> personal >> >> >>>> >>>>> preference) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> or >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bitbucket. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise >> >> >>>> Architect, >> >> >>>> >>>>> Open >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> Source >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Integration specialist >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Victor NOËL < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> victor.n...@linagora.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I arrive a bit late, but are we sure sourceforge >> is a >> >> good >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> solution? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all the fuss about their terrible behaviour >> by >> >> >>>> >>>>> implanting >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> adware >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other spyware in installers available to download >> >> there. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It became known with the big complain of the Gimp >> >> project >> >> >>>> >>>>> (that >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wasn't >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even fixed by SourceForge…). >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> See >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_installer/ >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for details. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Victor >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 04/09/2015 13:29, Pontus Ullgren a écrit : >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we not already have volunteers in the current >> set >> >> of >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> contributors >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the project ? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I for one is willing in continue maintaining the >> >> project >> >> >>>> >>>>> once >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> it >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> has >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moved (where ever it is moved). >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the question right now is the progress of >> >> the SF >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> migration. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 at 09:18 Henryk Konsek < >> >> >>>> >>>>> hekon...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as I know the Apache Extras projects are >> >> being >> >> >>>> >>>>> moved to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> the... >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SourceForge. So we need to find a volunteer >> willing >> >> to >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> maintain >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after SourceForge migration. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers! >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 3.09.2015 o 20:38 użytkownik Pontus >> Ullgren < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ullg...@gmail.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have not seen any other updates on the comdev >> >> mailing >> >> >>>> list >> >> >>>> >>>>> no. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps we should reach out to Daniel Gruno >> (that >> >> >>>> seems >> >> >>>> >>>>> to be >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> in >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charge >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the move) to get a status update for >> camel-extra. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 at 23:57 Raul Kripalani < >> >> >>>> >>>>> r...@evosent.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have an update on the ASF front about >> the >> >> >>>> Apache >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> Extras >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Users are asking for new releases of >> camel-extras >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> components... >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I quickly went through the ComDev thread but >> >> found no >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> conclusion. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe I >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> overlooked an email in that thread. Things >> tend to >> >> get >> >> >>>> >>>>> very >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> chatty >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there and there's no clearly marked conclusion >> >> email. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani* >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | >> Enterprise >> >> >>>> >>>>> Architect, >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> Open >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Integration specialist >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Pontus >> Ullgren < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> ullg...@gmail.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From this thread[1] it seems that Daniel >> Gruno >> >> is >> >> >>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>> one >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> in >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> charge >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the move. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I fail to find any indication on the >> >> >>>> progress >> >> >>>> >>>>> or >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> roadmap. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using Github as a backup plan does NOT[2] >> seem to >> >> >>>> be a >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> option in >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion of the community-dev decision. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway perhaps we should move this >> discussion to >> >> the >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> camel-dev >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailinglist. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3C559EC097.7000707%40apache.org%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/%3cby2pr03mb490b6943e12f5d925203a2e99...@by2pr03mb490.namprd03.prod.outlook.com%3E >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 at 07:17 Christoph >> >> Emmersberger < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cemme...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any date when this move is >> expected? We >> >> >>>> have >> >> >>>> >>>>> still >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> backup >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plan >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Github in place, ... >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Pontus >> Ullgren >> >> < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ullg...@gmail.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Diging through the community development list >> >> shows >> >> >>>> >>>>> that it >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> will >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moved >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to sourceforge along with the rest of the >> apache >> >> >>>> extra. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev//201507.mbox/browser >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:12 Pontus Ullgren < >> >> >>>> >>>>> ullg...@gmail.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes this has been discussed on the dev >> list[1][2] >> >> >>>> and >> >> >>>> >>>>> the >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development mailing list [2]. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortuantly there does not seem to be any >> >> >>>> >>>>> conclusion on >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> this >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> // Pontus >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Moving-camel-extra-to-github-tt5764066.html >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-camel-extra-moves-forward-tt5765822.html >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] >> >> >>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-community >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 at 18:53 Tim Dudgeon < >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tdudgeon...@gmail.com> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now that the Google code site is about to >> switch >> >> to >> >> >>>> read >> >> >>>> >>>>>>> only >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ( >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >> https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/camel-extra/) >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondered >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what is going to happen to the Camel Extras >> stuff? >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Henryk Konsek >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://about.me/hekonsek >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, >> >> >>>> développée >> >> >>>> >>>>> et >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> supportée >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> par Linagora. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à >> une >> >> offre >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> entreprise. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vous utilisez la version libre et gratuite d'OBM, >> >> >>>> développée >> >> >>>> >>>>> et >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> supportée >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> par Linagora. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Contribuez à la R&D du produit en souscrivant à une >> >> offre >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>> entreprise. >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pro.obm.org/ - http://www.linagora.com >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > -- >> >> >>>> > Krzysztof Sobkowiak >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > JEE & OSS Architect, Integration Architect >> >> >>>> > Apache Software Foundation Member (http://apache.org/) >> >> >>>> > Apache ServiceMix Committer & PMC Member ( >> >> >>>> http://servicemix.apache.org/) >> >> >>>> > Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC ( >> >> >>>> http://www.capgeminisoftware.pl/) >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > 33rd Degree 4charity (http://2015.33degree.org/) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>>> -- >> >> >>>> David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Claus Ibsen >> >> ----------------- >> >> http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus >> >> Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen >> >
