Hey D&I peeps, I love Gris' plan for how to communicate with the projects, but (speaking as a board member here), I want her, in her role as V.P., to have the latitude to adjust that plan if the reality on the ground makes that necessary. I trust Gris, and I don't want any of our projects to suffer board oversight and direction at that level of detail. So I'm going to leave the communications plan off the board notification.
(Speaking again as just another D&I peep) I'm going to put this up for a vote now. This DISCUSS thread was quite productive and overall, I'm pleased with how we worked together on this. I hope that we can keep this positive energy on this work going forward. Best, Myrle (I feel a little silly here writing a notification for myself. I'm glad there are 8 other board members who'll be looking at this too. : o) On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 10:48 PM Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 8:18 AM Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Remember this is a notification to the board. The level of specificity > > you > > > are proposing I add goes well beyond what the board requires from other > > > areas; even for budget requests. I will not hold up this item until > that > > > level of detail is available. > > > > While it is a notice to the board, it's also a roadmap for the committee > > to follow. > > > > This board member thinks that no such specificity is required or even > desirable. > > I think that the people doing the work here are doing a FINE job and should > be allowed to get on with it without additional stone fetching. >
