ha ha ... it is even worth ... looks like the income landline is broken somewhere at the last few inches ...
a technician will come tomorrow and do some tests ... maybe then it is solved ... Cheers Markus On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: > That is really unfortunate - it's like in Nepal where the fiber-optic > cable got stolen as soon as it got installed! > > Please let us know when you get an alternate connection and are ready to > look at the code and identify a fix. The interns are standing by and i have > another volunteer who is ready to work on the front-end too. > > Ed > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Markus Geiss <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> sadly my internet is not working ... looks like a line is broken ... and >> I can't tell how long this will take. >> >> As long as I don't have a decent internet connection it is nearly >> impossible to do some work. >> >> I'll keep you all posted on the progress. >> >> Sorry & Cheers >> >> Markus >> >> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:52 PM Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Markus, >>> >>> Welcome back from from Indonesia! Have you had a chance to look into >>> this? >>> >>> Ed >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Markus Geiss <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> I will dedicate early next week to unblock you ... right now I'm trying >>>> to keep up with work leftover from the past two week when I was on a >>>> business travel. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> Markus >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 6:18 AM Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks Markus. I hope dojo is going well and looking forward to >>>>> hearing how the trip went. >>>>> >>>>> Safe travels! >>>>> >>>>> Ed >>>>> >>>>> On May 31, 2017 21:09, "Markus Geiss" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm still on a business trip in Indonesia, but I'll be back to my >>>>>> office next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once I'm settle I'll reach out to you to sort out the issues and help >>>>>> unblocking you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Greez from Jakarta >>>>>> >>>>>> Markus >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:00 AM Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Markus, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to resurface this email to the top of your inbox in case >>>>>>> you missed the last one I sent out. Nathan is still patiently awaiting >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> fix after nearly a year. Raunak is eager to complete the work once we >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> get the surveys stored on the back-end. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not only is it inhibiting one of our important customers in Latin >>>>>>> America, it's now a blocker for two of our Google Summer of Code >>>>>>> projects - >>>>>>> our interns working on the mobile field officer app can't complete the >>>>>>> surveys work that Nasim started and our intern working on the mobile >>>>>>> self-service app can't add this functionality. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for taking the time to help address this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Ed Cable <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Markus, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I know that you are busy with the pilots at Generation 3, but all >>>>>>>> of the community resources who have been looking into this are blocked >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> a paying Mifos customer, Mentors International, who has willingly >>>>>>>> served as >>>>>>>> a reference for our Latin American outreach efforts over the past year >>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>> patiently been awaiting the ability to capture PPI for nearly a year >>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This was also (just a small part) of the PPI commitment we made to >>>>>>>> the 100M Project in 2015 >>>>>>>> <http://mifos.org/blog/100-million-project-commitment/> and we've >>>>>>>> yet to provide a workable solution for users to capture PPIs in Mifos. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you please make yourself available for a call with Raunak (and >>>>>>>> ideally Maulik and Nazeer) to help him get the through blocker once >>>>>>>> and for >>>>>>>> all. I know the fix is simple but working through the fix together >>>>>>>> will be >>>>>>>> the best usage of effort in the community to complete the valuable work >>>>>>>> you've started for the SPM framework in Apache Fineract - SPM and the >>>>>>>> means >>>>>>>> to properly collect these metrics really helps set apart our software >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We are also going to have survey collection as part of both the >>>>>>>> android and web self-service apps so this is a critical blocker that we >>>>>>>> must get removed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The full thread is down below and I've tried to bring some other >>>>>>>> conversations from five other separate email threads. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Nathan's Request* >>>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *As a user, I must have ability to view the completed PPI >>>>>>>> scorecards along with its calculated score in the web app.* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nathan would also love to know where the score is stored in the DB >>>>>>>> so he can do an average and see the PPI results for a group of clients >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> of each client over time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If the interface could show that too it would be great. >>>>>>>> Something like >>>>>>>> Client Lincoln X >>>>>>>> Date PPI 1 >>>>>>>> Date PPI 2 >>>>>>>> Date PPI 3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Raunak's blocker:* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm a little stuck on retrieving responses. Its proving to be a >>>>>>>> little hurdle for me. I tried it maybe I'm doing something wrong. I am >>>>>>>> able >>>>>>>> to create surveys but I am unable to retrieve responses for any of the >>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>> surveys or even the ppi for philliphines >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Santosh's issue:* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> However upon submission, responses don't seem to be linked to the >>>>>>>> lookup table as they don't get scored and tabulated and there is no >>>>>>>> confirmation that the responses have been captured nor an ability to >>>>>>>> view >>>>>>>> the recorded responses. I wanted to identify 1) what is caused by >>>>>>>> Santosh >>>>>>>> not having used the uploader 2) which are bugs and 3) which is >>>>>>>> functionality that has not been implemented yet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Markus' reply on March 23* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The main issue with the uploader is because the URL for mifos has >>>>>>>> changed since incubating at Apache, and not all surrounding tools are >>>>>>>> update to reflect this change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Everything else seems to be an issue with how the client sends the >>>>>>>> data. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Nathan McClellan < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>>>> Any update? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:38 PM Nathan McClellan < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:24 PM Raunak Sett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, we are working on it. We are done with the new survey >>>>>>>>>>> creation. We should be done with creation of lookup tables also for >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> tracking of key metrics within the next week. I am stuck on showing >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> responses for now. Its a little blocker for me. But I'm sure we'll >>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>> through it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, 4:02 AM Nathan McClellan < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello all! >>>>>>>>>>> Any progress? >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a developer but anything I can do to help? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:52 AM Nathan McClellan < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes that sounds great. >>>>>>>>>>> On #3 please make sure it gives the score in the results. Also I >>>>>>>>>>> would love to know where this is stored in the DB so we can do an >>>>>>>>>>> average >>>>>>>>>>> and see the PPI results for a group of clients and of each client >>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>> time. >>>>>>>>>>> If the interface could show that too it would be great. >>>>>>>>>>> Something like >>>>>>>>>>> Client Lincoln X >>>>>>>>>>> Date PPI 1 >>>>>>>>>>> Date PPI 2 >>>>>>>>>>> Date PPI 3 >>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:22 PM Raunak Sett < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ed Yes I'll be working on this. I am starting with the survey >>>>>>>>>>> creation from the community app first after that I'll be working on >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> ASAP. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017, 4:43 AM Ed Cable <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nathan, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just to clarify you need the following (1, 2, 3), correct? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI >>>>>>>>>>> scorecard >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on >>>>>>>>>>> your instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as >>>>>>>>>>> XMLs. >>>>>>>>>>> This should work fine right now (apart from having to make some >>>>>>>>>>> slight >>>>>>>>>>> modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to >>>>>>>>>>> resources >>>>>>>>>>> with switch to fineract from mifos x. >>>>>>>>>>> 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at >>>>>>>>>>> https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any >>>>>>>>>>> client, clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> survey from the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>> needs to be done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the >>>>>>>>>>> scorecards and scores are being properly tabulated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 3) View recorded surveys from the web app >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something >>>>>>>>>>> you could take up? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Out of scope for what you need. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Additional Context from Another Email >>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> These are the legacy docs on the old question group >>>>>>>>>>> functionality: >>>>>>>>>>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/Question+Groups+and+PPI >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.flossmanuals.net/mifos-user-manual/how-to-add-a-question-group/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So for the UI, we need: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) UI to select an available PPI scorecard for a given country >>>>>>>>>>> and then create a survey instance of this (ideally this could >>>>>>>>>>> be done at different entities - client, loan) >>>>>>>>>>> 2) UI to record the instance. For example if in step 1 above I >>>>>>>>>>> wanted to create a survey instance of the PH PPI at the client >>>>>>>>>>> level I now need a button within the client record to record >>>>>>>>>>> survey and then display the scorecard >>>>>>>>>>> 3) UI to view recorded survey. Now that a survey is recorded, I >>>>>>>>>>> need to be able to view that recorded survey from the client >>>>>>>>>>> record and see the date/time stamp/version. Is the date/version all >>>>>>>>>>> recorded in background able to to be displayed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now I have some other questions regarding the flexibility of the >>>>>>>>>>> surveys/SPM framework and how it relates to data tables. Is the >>>>>>>>>>> surveys framework only for pre-defined scorecards like PPI, >>>>>>>>>>> IRIS, MPAT, UN SDGs, etc? Or is it also to create brand new " >>>>>>>>>>> surveys". >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My first question would be this. If I want to create a survey from >>>>>>>>>>> scratch (i.e. a completely unique 15-question business plan >>>>>>>>>>> survey) should I do this via a Data Table or should I use your >>>>>>>>>>> surveys framework. If the latter, should the surveys framework >>>>>>>>>>> be used to define a question bank (of multiple question types - >>>>>>>>>>> free-form, >>>>>>>>>>> text, multi-select, etc.) and then from this question bank, create a >>>>>>>>>>> survey (i.e. give it a title, select questions) and then save >>>>>>>>>>> as a survey). If this is all possible, I want to work with >>>>>>>>>>> volunteers to finalize the wireframes Nayan worked on and implement >>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> survey wizard to create surveys powered by the Surveys >>>>>>>>>>> Framework. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Nathan McClellan < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. >>>>>>>>>>> How many programing hours do you think are left? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:55 PM Ed Cable <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> HI Nathan, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I apologize for the delays on this. I'm still trying to work >>>>>>>>>>> with a volunteer to get this work finished up. Sorry that I can't >>>>>>>>>>> expedite >>>>>>>>>>> it any further. I'm in touch with Maulik along with Raunak. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Markus replied separately regarding the query I had before: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My first question would be this. If I want to create a survey from >>>>>>>>>>> scratch (i.e. a completely unique 15-question business plan >>>>>>>>>>> survey) should I do this via a Data Table or should I use your >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- Markus Geiss Chief Technology Officer, Kuelap, Inc. <http://kuelap.io/> +49 1522 9505306
