On 27 déc. 07, at 10:17, Javier SOLA wrote:

Jean-Christophe Helary wrote

We need a localization format (PO, XLIFF, key=value, anything) that matches the localization data SUN provides us with (TMX).

I have read this 20 times in 2 days, and I dissagree. We need to use TM, but we can perfectly well generate our own TM with the format that we have.

At this point I believe that the best PO editor is KBabel, but it runs only on Linux. It does quite good TM matching, enough for the needs of OOo translation.

Do you see a connection between your first sentence and your second sentence ?

I am talking from the perspective of a user who does not run Linux and who uses multiplatform translation tools that are created to _support_ TMX based TMs.

KBabel/Linux users may be very lucky to benefit from already tested workflows, but as far as Windows or Mac users are concerned such workflows are not portable.

As I said before, and you have read this a number of times probably, I don't care about the formats that we are provided with, as long as their is _internal consistency_ in the data. Which is not the case today with the PO/TMX pair provided by the coordinators/SUN.

Also, for your information, the TMX created from the Translate Toolkit with po2tmx do not produce data that is consistent with the PO files that are created with the same Translate Toolkit's oo2po.

I have discussed that in the past with the Translate Toolkits developers and they argued that their was no problem with this inconsistency...

In the end, I am arguing that besides for nice workflows, redundant and accessible meta-data, what we need is tools that produce consistent data from one side of the tool chain to the other side.

That is not the case with the current tool chain.

Can you explain how you do to get a "good enough" workflow with TM re- use in Khmer ?

Jean-Christophe Helary

------------------------------------
http://mac4translators.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to