El mié, 10-05-2006 a las 13:22 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss escribió: > Thorsten Scherler wrote: > > > Like I said in the first mail "This initial document is intended as a > > discussion starter." IMO it does not makes sense *at all* that we start > > to add different opinions to the document. We should review the proposal > > and change the parts that we do not agree on. > > i don't expect too many changes. this is a well-written, sensible document.
Seems that Michi do not agree on that. > >> Otherwise we should start with a blank paper ... > > > > Like the blank paper that we now have since becoming a top level? > > > > Please can we agree that it makes sense to have a basis and not a blank > > paper. > > starting from scratch strikes me as a supremely stupid idea. Me too. I have never seen that project guidelines were started from scratch. Further as soon someone comes up with a draft I saw other starting the discussion about certain points of the draft and not counterproductive about a blank paper. salu2 -- thorsten "Together we stand, divided we fall!" Hey you (Pink Floyd) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
