Let's switch to opt-out based approach. Unless someone explicitly doesn't
want to in Solr PMC, he/she should be part of it.

On Thu, 4 Jun, 2020, 10:48 pm Anshum Gupta, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jan,
>
> Thank you for taking the lead on this.
>
> Sure, I can take the lead on this especially as I need to work on the
> board report and send our report by the 10th.
>
> We just need the PMC members for the draft resolution and I strongly feel
> that this shouldn't be an opt-in as people might miss this email. They
> shouldn't come back to find they missed adding themselves here and be in a
> weird position.
> If at all, we can at the very least auto opt-in for everyone who's been
> active in the last 3 years.
>
> What does everyone else think?
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:19 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Note: All committers, please add your name to
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Solr+TLP+needed+changes#SolrTLPneededchanges-resolutionDraftboardresolution
>>  if
>> you intend to also be a committer in the new Solr TLP. This is *opt-in*.
>>
>> Also add your comments for the Board Resolution Draft if you have any.
>> Anshum, will you take the lead on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14521 ?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> 19. mai 2020 kl. 11:07 skrev Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>:
>>
>> I've set up two tasks: SOLR-14497 and LUCENE-9375 to track the things
>> that must be done. Please help out, edit and comment on the Jira
>> issue.
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> <[email protected]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Reply via email to