Here is how I think it should be done (just my two cents): We create two sections in the board proposal: one for initial PMC and one for initial committers. Both are replicated from the existing set with the option for people to opt out.
Atri On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 01:00, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Absolutely. We can always add a section about committers. In the board > report, I will highlight that we have bootstrapped the new TLP using the > existing project. > > They would be the same lists for both projects. > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Since this is going to be a TLP, I believe there can be segregation >> between the PMC and the committer list (unlike an incubation project where >> the only initial entity is a PPMC). >> >> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 00:00, Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's now unclear if non PMC folks should be on or off the list on the >>> wiki (and how do we ensure we get added in the end?) >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:39 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If we don't do opt-in (and there's plenty of people who seem to want >>>> opt-out instead), then I propose we instead seek the board's input on how >>>> to navigate these waters. The board is there to help with such things. >>>> >>>> ~ David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Let's switch to opt-out based approach. Unless someone explicitly >>>>> doesn't want to in Solr PMC, he/she should be part of it. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 4 Jun, 2020, 10:48 pm Anshum Gupta, <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Jan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for taking the lead on this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure, I can take the lead on this especially as I need to work on the >>>>>> board report and send our report by the 10th. >>>>>> >>>>>> We just need the PMC members for the draft resolution and I strongly >>>>>> feel that this shouldn't be an opt-in as people might miss this email. >>>>>> They >>>>>> shouldn't come back to find they missed adding themselves here and be in >>>>>> a >>>>>> weird position. >>>>>> If at all, we can at the very least auto opt-in for everyone who's >>>>>> been active in the last 3 years. >>>>>> >>>>>> What does everyone else think? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:19 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Note: All committers, please add your name to >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Solr+TLP+needed+changes#SolrTLPneededchanges-resolutionDraftboardresolution >>>>>>> if >>>>>>> you intend to also be a committer in the new Solr TLP. This is >>>>>>> *opt-in*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also add your comments for the Board Resolution Draft if you have >>>>>>> any. >>>>>>> Anshum, will you take the lead on >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14521 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 19. mai 2020 kl. 11:07 skrev Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've set up two tasks: SOLR-14497 and LUCENE-9375 to track the things >>>>>>> that must be done. Please help out, edit and comment on the Jira >>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dawid >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Atri >> Apache Concerted >> > > > -- > Anshum Gupta > -- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted
