+1 On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:35 PM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is how I think it should be done (just my two cents): > > We create two sections in the board proposal: one for initial PMC and one > for initial committers. Both are replicated from the existing set with the > option for people to opt out. > > Atri > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 01:00, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Absolutely. We can always add a section about committers. In the board >> report, I will highlight that we have bootstrapped the new TLP using the >> existing project. >> >> They would be the same lists for both projects. >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Since this is going to be a TLP, I believe there can be segregation >>> between the PMC and the committer list (unlike an incubation project where >>> the only initial entity is a PPMC). >>> >>> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 00:00, Gus Heck <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> It's now unclear if non PMC folks should be on or off the list on the >>>> wiki (and how do we ensure we get added in the end?) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:39 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If we don't do opt-in (and there's plenty of people who seem to want >>>>> opt-out instead), then I propose we instead seek the board's input on how >>>>> to navigate these waters. The board is there to help with such things. >>>>> >>>>> ~ David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Let's switch to opt-out based approach. Unless someone explicitly >>>>>> doesn't want to in Solr PMC, he/she should be part of it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 4 Jun, 2020, 10:48 pm Anshum Gupta, <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jan, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for taking the lead on this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure, I can take the lead on this especially as I need to work on >>>>>>> the board report and send our report by the 10th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We just need the PMC members for the draft resolution and I strongly >>>>>>> feel that this shouldn't be an opt-in as people might miss this email. >>>>>>> They >>>>>>> shouldn't come back to find they missed adding themselves here and be >>>>>>> in a >>>>>>> weird position. >>>>>>> If at all, we can at the very least auto opt-in for everyone who's >>>>>>> been active in the last 3 years. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does everyone else think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:19 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Note: All committers, please add your name to >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Solr+TLP+needed+changes#SolrTLPneededchanges-resolutionDraftboardresolution >>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>> you intend to also be a committer in the new Solr TLP. This is >>>>>>>> *opt-in*. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also add your comments for the Board Resolution Draft if you have >>>>>>>> any. >>>>>>>> Anshum, will you take the lead on >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14521 ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 19. mai 2020 kl. 11:07 skrev Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've set up two tasks: SOLR-14497 and LUCENE-9375 to track the >>>>>>>> things >>>>>>>> that must be done. Please help out, edit and comment on the Jira >>>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dawid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Anshum Gupta >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Atri >>> Apache Concerted >>> >> >> >> -- >> Anshum Gupta >> > -- > Regards, > > Atri > Apache Concerted > -- Anshum Gupta
