On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2014-09-09, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Your CLA is sufficient if you, yourself, commit it to an Apache repo. Since >>> we're planning to push a repo full of contributions from github to apache, >>> the CLA is not enough on its own. > >> Explain to me how the CLA doesn't cover this case? Whether the code >> sat on your machine for 10 years or traveled through 20 repos. It's >> still your code and the conditions of the CLA apply. > > Take a look at the definition of "Contribution" inside the CLA > > "Contribution" shall mean any original work of authorship, > including any modifications or additions to an existing work, that > is intentionally submitted by You to the Foundation for inclusion > in, or documentation of, any of the products owned or managed by > the Foundation (the "Work"). > > The code committed to github has not been "intentionally submitted to > the Foundation". > Taking that work and committing into an Apache repository would be. > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > Thanks, Jason ---------------------------------------------------------- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl http://twitter.com/takari_io --------------------------------------------------------- To think is easy. To act is hard. But the hardest thing in the world is to act in accordance with your thinking. -- Johann von Goethe
