On 2014-09-09, Jason van Zyl wrote: > On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2014-09-09, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Your CLA is sufficient if you, yourself, commit it to an Apache repo. Since >>>> we're planning to push a repo full of contributions from github to apache, >>>> the CLA is not enough on its own. >>> Explain to me how the CLA doesn't cover this case? Whether the code >>> sat on your machine for 10 years or traveled through 20 repos. It's >>> still your code and the conditions of the CLA apply. >> Take a look at the definition of "Contribution" inside the CLA >> "Contribution" shall mean any original work of authorship, >> including any modifications or additions to an existing work, that >> is intentionally submitted by You to the Foundation for inclusion >> in, or documentation of, any of the products owned or managed by >> the Foundation (the "Work"). >> The code committed to github has not been "intentionally submitted to >> the Foundation". > Taking that work and committing into an Apache repository would be. When every contributors so by him/herself, sure. "submitted by YOU". Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
