> Plus, maybe instead of referring to the netbeans.org domain, we should add at the end "that is currently under Oracle's control".
This does sound better. --emi On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < [email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Emilian Bold: > > > > My guess is that an explicit list is better than something vague. > > > You think this is vague? It seems very explicit and all encompassing: > > "NetBeans: any source code, object code, patch, tool, sample, graphic, > specification, manual, documentation, or any other material." > > Plus, maybe instead of referring to the netbeans.org domain, we should add > at the end "that is currently under Oracle's control". > > I.e., the point is that Oracle is giving up control of everything related > to NetBeans -- the description above covers 'everything' in the terms used > right now in the OCA. > > I'm sure that if, instead of the above [or something similar to it], if we > were going to make an explicit list, we'll leave something out, i.e., we'll > forget about something and then have problems later. The above, on the > other hand, encompasses everything. > > Gj > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Emilian Bold <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Shouldn't somebody from Apache legal settle this? > > > > My guess is that an explicit list is better than something vague. > > > > For example, what happens when netbeans.org is restructured -- how can > ASF > > claim that something is covered by the code granted or not? > > > > > > --emi > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > > > > That would work for me but playing the devil's advocate I assume you > > > > could stretch that to mean any NetBeans book? ;-) > > > > > > > > Maybe adding "that is currently distributed via the netbeans.org > > > > domain" would fix that? > > > > > > > > > Good point. If that indeed fixes it, we could do it like that. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > > > [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > ...could we respond to "List of software and other intellectual > > > > > property covered by this agreement" in the Software Grant Agreement > > > with > > > > > the following words: > > > > > > > > > > "NetBeans: any source code, object code, patch, tool, sample, > > graphic, > > > > > specification, manual, documentation, or any other material." ... > > > > > > > > That would work for me but playing the devil's advocate I assume you > > > > could stretch that to mean any NetBeans book? ;-) > > > > > > > > Maybe adding "that is currently distributed via the netbeans.org > > > > domain" would fix that? > > > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > > > > >
