OK, the IPMC vote has been up since Friday, i.e., on the incubator@general mailing list.
There’s a question there re a legal issue that we need to answer. Aside from that, what can we do to get the missing binding +1 (since we have two of those from our mentors and need at least three in total)? Anyone someone can ping re this — also note we have 5 mentors of which 2 are actually active (and wonderfully helpful thank you Bertrand and Ate). Should something be done about this? Many thanks and a good week to everyone, Gj On Friday, February 9, 2018, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > It looks to me like we should go ahead with the IPMC vote, though ideally > I think we’d add/correct the page referenced above with info to avoid these > tagging problems before we do that. > > Any insights/ideas re this? > > Gj > > On Friday, February 9, 2018, Geertjan Wielenga < > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Here's our release management page with instructions I followed in >> putting the rc3 together: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+ >> NetBeans+Release+README >> >> What could be added/changed/corrected in the above to avoid the >> specific issues that have arisen with the tag -- and anything else to >> make the above as complete as possible? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gj >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:59 AM, John Muczynski <johnst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > re: LICENSE being slightly different in the source tarball >> > Here at SimuQuest, we've had similar confusions between files which are >> > templates in version control but fleshed out in the release. >> > Our solution has been to >> > * keep the templates in a separate folder >> > * use a templating language like the one in maven or Velocity >> > * try to keep comments in each file saying what it is and where it >> came >> > from >> > * not include the template folder in the binary release >> > >> > For us, this has been motivated less by tarball comparisons and more by >> > wanting developers to modify and commit the "right" copy of the file. >> > >> > Hope the info helps. >> > >> > Kind Regards, >> > Johnny >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Johnny Muczynski >> > 734-262-2045 >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 5:39 AM, Neil C Smith <neilcsm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 at 10:30 Bertrand Delacretaz < >> bdelacre...@apache.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I think LICENSE being slightly different (better actually, right?) in >> >> > the source tarball is perfectly fine if there's a rational reason for >> >> > it - you just need to reassure people that it's not a mistake. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks. Yes it's better - to clarify I meant aiming towards checking >> in >> >> and tracking history in git of the version in the full source bundle. >> >> Something for a later discussion anyway. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > For that you just need to be able to answer such questions with "have >> >> > a look at http://netbeans.apache.org/release-management.html"; >> instead >> >> > of re-explaining every time. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Definitely one to add to the list of initial pages we were discussing >> the >> >> other day then! ;-) >> >> >> >> Thanks and best wishes, >> >> >> >> Neil >> >> -- >> >> Neil C Smith >> >> Artist & Technologist >> >> www.neilcsmith.net >> >> >> >> Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - >> www.praxislive.org >> >> >> >
